viafb: rename output devices
Now it looks like we finally know enough about the output devices to give them proper names. As VIA_96 is often referred to as DVP0 rename it to VIA_DVP0. As VIA_6C and VIA_93 seem to exist only on CLE266 and "replace" DVP0 and DVP1 there rename them to VIA_LDVP0 and VIA_LDVP1 (L as legacy). The proc names were changed accordingly which should be harmless as they were just introduced and not beyond RFC state. This patch should make things a bit more comfortable and less scary. Signed-off-by: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Joseph Chan <JosephChan@via.com.tw> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
dd7a0b08cd
Коммит
a2aa9f9f5a
|
@ -719,9 +719,9 @@ static struct rgbLUT palLUT_table[] = {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct via_device_mapping device_mapping[] = {
|
||||
{VIA_6C, "6C"},
|
||||
{VIA_93, "93"},
|
||||
{VIA_96, "96"},
|
||||
{VIA_LDVP0, "LDVP0"},
|
||||
{VIA_LDVP1, "LDVP1"},
|
||||
{VIA_DVP0, "DVP0"},
|
||||
{VIA_CRT, "CRT"},
|
||||
{VIA_DVP1, "DVP1"},
|
||||
{VIA_LVDS1, "LVDS1"},
|
||||
|
@ -763,11 +763,11 @@ static u32 get_dvi_devices(int output_interface)
|
|||
{
|
||||
switch (output_interface) {
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DVP0:
|
||||
return VIA_96 | VIA_6C;
|
||||
return VIA_DVP0 | VIA_LDVP0;
|
||||
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DVP1:
|
||||
if (viaparinfo->chip_info->gfx_chip_name == UNICHROME_CLE266)
|
||||
return VIA_93;
|
||||
return VIA_LDVP1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return VIA_DVP1;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static u32 get_dvi_devices(int output_interface)
|
|||
if (viaparinfo->chip_info->gfx_chip_name == UNICHROME_CLE266)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return VIA_LVDS2 | VIA_96;
|
||||
return VIA_LVDS2 | VIA_DVP0;
|
||||
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DFP_LOW:
|
||||
if (viaparinfo->chip_info->gfx_chip_name == UNICHROME_CLE266)
|
||||
|
@ -794,13 +794,13 @@ static u32 get_lcd_devices(int output_interface)
|
|||
{
|
||||
switch (output_interface) {
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DVP0:
|
||||
return VIA_96;
|
||||
return VIA_DVP0;
|
||||
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DVP1:
|
||||
return VIA_DVP1;
|
||||
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DFP_HIGH:
|
||||
return VIA_LVDS2 | VIA_96;
|
||||
return VIA_LVDS2 | VIA_DVP0;
|
||||
|
||||
case INTERFACE_DFP_LOW:
|
||||
return VIA_LVDS1 | VIA_DVP1;
|
||||
|
@ -988,17 +988,17 @@ static void set_crt_source(u8 iga)
|
|||
via_write_reg_mask(VIASR, 0x16, value, 0x40);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void set_6C_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
static inline void set_ldvp0_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_source_common(0x6C, 7, iga);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void set_93_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
static inline void set_ldvp1_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_source_common(0x93, 7, iga);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void set_96_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
static inline void set_dvp0_source(u8 iga)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_source_common(0x96, 4, iga);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1020,12 +1020,12 @@ static inline void set_lvds2_source(u8 iga)
|
|||
|
||||
void via_set_source(u32 devices, u8 iga)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_6C)
|
||||
set_6C_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_93)
|
||||
set_93_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_96)
|
||||
set_96_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_LDVP0)
|
||||
set_ldvp0_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_LDVP1)
|
||||
set_ldvp1_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_DVP0)
|
||||
set_dvp0_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_CRT)
|
||||
set_crt_source(iga);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_DVP1)
|
||||
|
@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static void set_crt_state(u8 state)
|
|||
via_write_reg_mask(VIACR, 0x36, value, 0x30);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void set_96_state(u8 state)
|
||||
static void set_dvp0_state(u8 state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u8 value;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1136,11 +1136,11 @@ void via_set_state(u32 devices, u8 state)
|
|||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
TODO: Can we enable/disable these devices? How?
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_6C)
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_93)
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_LDVP0)
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_LDVP1)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_96)
|
||||
set_96_state(state);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_DVP0)
|
||||
set_dvp0_state(state);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_CRT)
|
||||
set_crt_state(state);
|
||||
if (devices & VIA_DVP1)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -33,9 +33,9 @@
|
|||
#define viafb_write_reg_mask(i, p, d, m) via_write_reg_mask(p, i, d, m)
|
||||
|
||||
/* VIA output devices */
|
||||
#define VIA_6C 0x00000001
|
||||
#define VIA_93 0x00000002
|
||||
#define VIA_96 0x00000004
|
||||
#define VIA_LDVP0 0x00000001
|
||||
#define VIA_LDVP1 0x00000002
|
||||
#define VIA_DVP0 0x00000004
|
||||
#define VIA_CRT 0x00000010
|
||||
#define VIA_DVP1 0x00000020
|
||||
#define VIA_LVDS1 0x00000040
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ static struct fb_ops viafb_ops;
|
|||
* K400 seems to support VIA_96, VIA_DVP1, VIA_LVDS{1,2} as in viamode.c
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static const u32 supported_odev_map[] = {
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CLE266] = VIA_CRT | VIA_6C | VIA_93,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_K400] = VIA_CRT | VIA_96 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CLE266] = VIA_CRT | VIA_LDVP0 | VIA_LDVP1,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_K400] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP0 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
| VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_K800] = VIA_CRT | VIA_96 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
[UNICHROME_K800] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP0 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
| VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_PM800] = VIA_CRT | VIA_96 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
[UNICHROME_PM800] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP0 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
| VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CN700] = VIA_CRT | VIA_96 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CN700] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP0 | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1
|
||||
| VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CX700] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1 | VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
[UNICHROME_CN750] = VIA_CRT | VIA_DVP1 | VIA_LVDS1 | VIA_LVDS2,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче