xfs: check that br_blockcount doesn't overflow

xfs_bmbt_irec.br_blockcount is declared as xfs_filblks_t, which is an
unsigned 64-bit integer.  Though the bmbt helpers will never set a value
larger than 2^21 (since the underlying on-disk extent record has a
length field that is only 21 bits wide), we should be a little defensive
about checking that a bmbt record doesn't exceed what we're expecting or
overflow into the next AG.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Darrick J. Wong 2018-01-16 18:54:13 -08:00
Родитель 55e45429ce
Коммит a5f460b168
1 изменённых файлов: 9 добавлений и 4 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ xfs_scrub_bmap_extent(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = info->sc->mp;
struct xfs_buf *bp = NULL;
xfs_filblks_t end;
int error = 0;
if (cur)
@ -332,19 +333,23 @@ xfs_scrub_bmap_extent(
irec->br_startoff);
/* Make sure the extent points to a valid place. */
if (irec->br_blockcount > MAXEXTLEN)
xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(info->sc, info->whichfork,
irec->br_startoff);
if (irec->br_startblock + irec->br_blockcount <= irec->br_startblock)
xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(info->sc, info->whichfork,
irec->br_startoff);
end = irec->br_startblock + irec->br_blockcount - 1;
if (info->is_rt &&
(!xfs_verify_rtbno(mp, irec->br_startblock) ||
!xfs_verify_rtbno(mp, irec->br_startblock +
irec->br_blockcount - 1)))
!xfs_verify_rtbno(mp, end)))
xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(info->sc, info->whichfork,
irec->br_startoff);
if (!info->is_rt &&
(!xfs_verify_fsbno(mp, irec->br_startblock) ||
!xfs_verify_fsbno(mp, irec->br_startblock +
irec->br_blockcount - 1)))
!xfs_verify_fsbno(mp, end) ||
XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, irec->br_startblock) !=
XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, end)))
xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(info->sc, info->whichfork,
irec->br_startoff);