ipv6: get rid of ipip6_prl_lock
As noticed by Julia Lawall, ipip6_tunnel_add_prl() incorrectly calls kzallloc(..., GFP_KERNEL) while a spinlock is held. She provided a patch to use GFP_ATOMIC instead. One possibility would be to convert this spinlock to a mutex, or preallocate the thing before taking the lock. After RCU conversion, it appears we dont need this lock, since caller already holds RTNL Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
95e3bb7aff
Коммит
aac4dddc35
|
@ -249,8 +249,6 @@ failed:
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipip6_prl_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
#define for_each_prl_rcu(start) \
|
||||
for (prl = rcu_dereference(start); \
|
||||
prl; \
|
||||
|
@ -340,7 +338,7 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
|
|||
if (a->addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
|
||||
ASSERT_RTNL();
|
||||
|
||||
for (p = t->prl; p; p = p->next) {
|
||||
if (p->addr == a->addr) {
|
||||
|
@ -370,7 +368,6 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
|
|||
t->prl_count++;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(t->prl, p);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -397,7 +394,7 @@ ipip6_tunnel_del_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a)
|
|||
struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry *x, **p;
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
|
||||
ASSERT_RTNL();
|
||||
|
||||
if (a && a->addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY)) {
|
||||
for (p = &t->prl; *p; p = &(*p)->next) {
|
||||
|
@ -419,7 +416,6 @@ ipip6_tunnel_del_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче