watchdog: Fix merge 'conflict'
Two watchdog changes that came through different trees had a non conflicting conflict, that is, one changed the semantics of a variable but no actual code conflict happened. So the merge appeared fine, but the resulting code did not behave as expected. Commit195daf665a
("watchdog: enable the new user interface of the watchdog mechanism") changes the semantics of watchdog_user_enabled, which thereafter is only used by the functions introduced byb3738d2932
("watchdog: Add watchdog enable/disable all functions"). There further appears to be a distinct lack of serialization between setting and using watchdog_enabled, so perhaps we should wrap the {en,dis}able_all() things in watchdog_proc_mutex. This patch fixes a s2r failure reported by Michal; which I cannot readily explain. But this does make the code internally consistent again. Reported-and-tested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
7cf7d424c3
Коммит
ab992dc38f
|
@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
|
|||
#define NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED (1 << NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED_BIT)
|
||||
#define SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED (1 << SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED_BIT)
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
|
||||
static unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled = SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
@ -608,26 +610,36 @@ void watchdog_nmi_enable_all(void)
|
|||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!watchdog_user_enabled)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(watchdog_enabled & NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
|
||||
watchdog_nmi_enable(cpu);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void watchdog_nmi_disable_all(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!watchdog_running)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
|
||||
watchdog_nmi_disable(cpu);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
|
||||
|
@ -744,8 +756,6 @@ static int proc_watchdog_update(void)
|
|||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_proc_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* common function for watchdog, nmi_watchdog and soft_watchdog parameter
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче