xen-netback: fix guest-receive-side array sizes
The sizes chosen for the metadata and grant_copy_op arrays on the guest receive size are wrong; - The meta array is needlessly twice the ring size, when we only ever consume a single array element per RX ring slot - The grant_copy_op array is way too small. It's sized based on a bogus assumption: that at most two copy ops will be used per ring slot. This may have been true at some point in the past but it's clear from looking at start_new_rx_buffer() that a new ring slot is only consumed if a frag would overflow the current slot (plus some other conditions) so the actual limit is MAX_SKB_FRAGS grant_copy_ops per ring slot. This patch fixes those two sizing issues and, because grant_copy_ops grows so much, it pulls it out into a separate chunk of vmalloc()ed memory. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
7a399e3a2e
Коммит
ac3d5ac277
|
@ -101,6 +101,13 @@ struct xenvif_rx_meta {
|
|||
|
||||
#define MAX_PENDING_REQS 256
|
||||
|
||||
/* It's possible for an skb to have a maximal number of frags
|
||||
* but still be less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in size. Thus the
|
||||
* worst-case number of copy operations is MAX_SKB_FRAGS per
|
||||
* ring slot.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE)
|
||||
|
||||
struct xenvif {
|
||||
/* Unique identifier for this interface. */
|
||||
domid_t domid;
|
||||
|
@ -143,13 +150,13 @@ struct xenvif {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
RING_IDX rx_req_cons_peek;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Given MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET of 4096 the worst case is that each
|
||||
* head/fragment page uses 2 copy operations because it
|
||||
* straddles two buffers in the frontend.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct gnttab_copy grant_copy_op[2*XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
|
||||
struct xenvif_rx_meta meta[2*XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
|
||||
/* This array is allocated seperately as it is large */
|
||||
struct gnttab_copy *grant_copy_op;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We create one meta structure per ring request we consume, so
|
||||
* the maximum number is the same as the ring size.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct xenvif_rx_meta meta[XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
|
||||
|
||||
u8 fe_dev_addr[6];
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -307,6 +307,15 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid,
|
|||
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, parent);
|
||||
|
||||
vif = netdev_priv(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
vif->grant_copy_op = vmalloc(sizeof(struct gnttab_copy) *
|
||||
MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
|
||||
if (vif->grant_copy_op == NULL) {
|
||||
pr_warn("Could not allocate grant copy space for %s\n", name);
|
||||
free_netdev(dev);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vif->domid = domid;
|
||||
vif->handle = handle;
|
||||
vif->can_sg = 1;
|
||||
|
@ -487,6 +496,7 @@ void xenvif_free(struct xenvif *vif)
|
|||
|
||||
unregister_netdev(vif->dev);
|
||||
|
||||
vfree(vif->grant_copy_op);
|
||||
free_netdev(vif->dev);
|
||||
|
||||
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif *vif)
|
|||
if (!npo.copy_prod)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > ARRAY_SIZE(vif->grant_copy_op));
|
||||
BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
|
||||
gnttab_batch_copy(vif->grant_copy_op, npo.copy_prod);
|
||||
|
||||
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&rxq)) != NULL) {
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче