x86, UV: Use allocated buffer in tlb_uv.c:tunables_read()

The original code didn't check that the value returned from
snprintf() was less than the size of the buffer.  Although it
didn't cause a runtime bug in this case, it makes the static
checkers complain.

Andrew Morton suggested a dynamically sized buffer would be
cleaner.

Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100929083118.GA6376@bicker>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Dan Carpenter 2010-09-29 10:41:05 +02:00 коммит произвёл Ingo Molnar
Родитель 4193d91635
Коммит b365a85c68
1 изменённых файлов: 8 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1001,10 +1001,10 @@ static int uv_ptc_seq_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
static ssize_t tunables_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
char buf[300];
char *buf;
int ret;
ret = snprintf(buf, 300, "%s %s %s\n%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s %s\n%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
"max_bau_concurrent plugged_delay plugsb4reset",
"timeoutsb4reset ipi_reset_limit complete_threshold",
"congested_response_us congested_reps congested_period",
@ -1012,7 +1012,12 @@ static ssize_t tunables_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
timeoutsb4reset, ipi_reset_limit, complete_threshold,
congested_response_us, congested_reps, congested_period);
return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, ret);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, strlen(buf));
kfree(buf);
return ret;
}
/*