drm/nouveau/tmr: fully separate alarm execution/pending lists

Reusing the list_head for both is a bad idea.  Callback execution is done
with the lock dropped so that alarms can be rescheduled from the callback,
which means that with some unfortunate timing, lists can get corrupted.

The execution list should not require its own locking, the single function
that uses it can only be called from a single context.

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Ben Skeggs 2017-06-05 17:23:32 +10:00
Родитель 8fa4338acc
Коммит b4e382ca75
2 изменённых файлов: 5 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
struct nvkm_alarm {
struct list_head head;
struct list_head exec;
u64 timestamp;
void (*func)(struct nvkm_alarm *);
};

Просмотреть файл

@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ nvkm_timer_alarm_trigger(struct nvkm_timer *tmr)
/* Move to completed list. We'll drop the lock before
* executing the callback so it can reschedule itself.
*/
list_move_tail(&alarm->head, &exec);
list_del_init(&alarm->head);
list_add(&alarm->exec, &exec);
}
/* Shut down interrupt if no more pending alarms. */
@ -59,8 +60,8 @@ nvkm_timer_alarm_trigger(struct nvkm_timer *tmr)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmr->lock, flags);
/* Execute completed callbacks. */
list_for_each_entry_safe(alarm, atemp, &exec, head) {
list_del_init(&alarm->head);
list_for_each_entry_safe(alarm, atemp, &exec, exec) {
list_del(&alarm->exec);
alarm->func(alarm);
}
}