io_uring: better to use REQ_F_IO_DRAIN for req->flags
It's better to use REQ_F_IO_DRAIN for req->flags rather than IOSQE_IO_DRAIN though they have same value. Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125092103.224502-3-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
e302f1046f
Коммит
b6c7db3218
|
@ -7095,10 +7095,10 @@ static void io_init_req_drain(struct io_kiocb *req)
|
|||
* If we need to drain a request in the middle of a link, drain
|
||||
* the head request and the next request/link after the current
|
||||
* link. Considering sequential execution of links,
|
||||
* IOSQE_IO_DRAIN will be maintained for every request of our
|
||||
* REQ_F_IO_DRAIN will be maintained for every request of our
|
||||
* link.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
head->flags |= IOSQE_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
|
||||
head->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
|
||||
ctx->drain_next = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -7149,7 +7149,7 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
|
|||
if (unlikely(ctx->drain_next) && !ctx->submit_state.link.head) {
|
||||
ctx->drain_next = false;
|
||||
ctx->drain_active = true;
|
||||
req->flags |= IOSQE_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
|
||||
req->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче