io_uring: better to use REQ_F_IO_DRAIN for req->flags

It's better to use REQ_F_IO_DRAIN for req->flags rather than
IOSQE_IO_DRAIN though they have same value.

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125092103.224502-3-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Hao Xu 2021-11-25 17:21:03 +08:00 коммит произвёл Jens Axboe
Родитель e302f1046f
Коммит b6c7db3218
1 изменённых файлов: 3 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -7095,10 +7095,10 @@ static void io_init_req_drain(struct io_kiocb *req)
* If we need to drain a request in the middle of a link, drain
* the head request and the next request/link after the current
* link. Considering sequential execution of links,
* IOSQE_IO_DRAIN will be maintained for every request of our
* REQ_F_IO_DRAIN will be maintained for every request of our
* link.
*/
head->flags |= IOSQE_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
head->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
ctx->drain_next = true;
}
}
@ -7149,7 +7149,7 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
if (unlikely(ctx->drain_next) && !ctx->submit_state.link.head) {
ctx->drain_next = false;
ctx->drain_active = true;
req->flags |= IOSQE_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
req->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC;
}
}