compiler.h: Remove ACCESS_ONCE()
There are no longer any kernelspace uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), so we can remove the definition from <linux/compiler.h>. This patch removes the ACCESS_ONCE() definition, and updates comments which referred to it. At the same time, some inconsistent and redundant whitespace is removed from comments. Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: apw@canonical.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171127103824.36526-4-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
2a22f692bb
Коммит
b899a85043
|
@ -220,21 +220,21 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The
|
||||
* compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of
|
||||
* READ_ONCE, WRITE_ONCE and ACCESS_ONCE (see below), but only when the
|
||||
* compiler is aware of some particular ordering. One way to make the
|
||||
* compiler aware of ordering is to put the two invocations of READ_ONCE,
|
||||
* WRITE_ONCE or ACCESS_ONCE() in different C statements.
|
||||
* READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE, but only when the compiler is aware of some
|
||||
* particular ordering. One way to make the compiler aware of ordering is to
|
||||
* put the two invocations of READ_ONCE or WRITE_ONCE in different C
|
||||
* statements.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In contrast to ACCESS_ONCE these two macros will also work on aggregate
|
||||
* data types like structs or unions. If the size of the accessed data
|
||||
* type exceeds the word size of the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits)
|
||||
* READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy(). There's at
|
||||
* least two memcpy()s: one for the __builtin_memcpy() and then one for
|
||||
* the macro doing the copy of variable - '__u' allocated on the stack.
|
||||
* These two macros will also work on aggregate data types like structs or
|
||||
* unions. If the size of the accessed data type exceeds the word size of
|
||||
* the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits) READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will
|
||||
* fall back to memcpy(). There's at least two memcpy()s: one for the
|
||||
* __builtin_memcpy() and then one for the macro doing the copy of variable
|
||||
* - '__u' allocated on the stack.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Their two major use cases are: (1) Mediating communication between
|
||||
* process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
|
||||
* and (2) Ensuring that the compiler does not fold, spindle, or otherwise
|
||||
* and (2) Ensuring that the compiler does not fold, spindle, or otherwise
|
||||
* mutilate accesses that either do not require ordering or that interact
|
||||
* with an explicit memory barrier or atomic instruction that provides the
|
||||
* required ordering.
|
||||
|
@ -327,29 +327,4 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
|
|||
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
|
||||
"Need native word sized stores/loads for atomicity.")
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching accesses. The compiler
|
||||
* is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of ACCESS_ONCE(),
|
||||
* but only when the compiler is aware of some particular ordering. One way
|
||||
* to make the compiler aware of ordering is to put the two invocations of
|
||||
* ACCESS_ONCE() in different C statements.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ACCESS_ONCE will only work on scalar types. For union types, ACCESS_ONCE
|
||||
* on a union member will work as long as the size of the member matches the
|
||||
* size of the union and the size is smaller than word size.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The major use cases of ACCESS_ONCE used to be (1) Mediating communication
|
||||
* between process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
|
||||
* and (2) Ensuring that the compiler does not fold, spindle, or otherwise
|
||||
* mutilate accesses that either do not require ordering or that interact
|
||||
* with an explicit memory barrier or atomic instruction that provides the
|
||||
* required ordering.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If possible use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() instead.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define __ACCESS_ONCE(x) ({ \
|
||||
__maybe_unused typeof(x) __var = (__force typeof(x)) 0; \
|
||||
(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x); })
|
||||
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*__ACCESS_ONCE(x))
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче