Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Ingo Molnar: "Two futex fixes: a input parameters robustness fix, and futex race fixes" * 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: futex: Prevent overflow by strengthen input validation futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex
This commit is contained in:
Коммит
b8c22594b1
|
@ -1878,6 +1878,9 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags,
|
|||
struct futex_q *this, *next;
|
||||
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nr_wake < 0 || nr_requeue < 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When PI not supported: return -ENOSYS if requeue_pi is true,
|
||||
* consequently the compiler knows requeue_pi is always false past
|
||||
|
@ -2294,21 +2297,17 @@ static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
|
|||
spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fixup the pi_state owner with the new owner.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Must be called with hash bucket lock held and mm->sem held for non
|
||||
* private futexes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
|
||||
struct task_struct *newowner)
|
||||
struct task_struct *argowner)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS;
|
||||
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state;
|
||||
u32 uval, uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
|
||||
struct task_struct *oldowner;
|
||||
struct task_struct *oldowner, *newowner;
|
||||
u32 newtid;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
oldowner = pi_state->owner;
|
||||
|
@ -2317,11 +2316,17 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
|
|||
newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are here either because we stole the rtmutex from the
|
||||
* previous highest priority waiter or we are the highest priority
|
||||
* waiter but have failed to get the rtmutex the first time.
|
||||
* We are here because either:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We have to replace the newowner TID in the user space variable.
|
||||
* - we stole the lock and pi_state->owner needs updating to reflect
|
||||
* that (@argowner == current),
|
||||
*
|
||||
* or:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - someone stole our lock and we need to fix things to point to the
|
||||
* new owner (@argowner == NULL).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Either way, we have to replace the TID in the user space variable.
|
||||
* This must be atomic as we have to preserve the owner died bit here.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: We write the user space value _before_ changing the pi_state
|
||||
|
@ -2334,6 +2339,42 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
|
|||
* in the PID check in lookup_pi_state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
if (!argowner) {
|
||||
if (oldowner != current) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We raced against a concurrent self; things are
|
||||
* already fixed up. Nothing to do.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
|
||||
/* We got the lock after all, nothing to fix. */
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since we just failed the trylock; there must be an owner.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
||||
BUG_ON(!newowner);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current);
|
||||
if (oldowner == current) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We raced against a concurrent self; things are
|
||||
* already fixed up. Nothing to do.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
newowner = argowner;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS;
|
||||
|
||||
if (get_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr))
|
||||
goto handle_fault;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2434,15 +2475,28 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
|||
* Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we
|
||||
* did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We can safely read pi_state->owner without holding wait_lock
|
||||
* because we now own the rt_mutex, only the owner will attempt
|
||||
* to change it.
|
||||
* Speculative pi_state->owner read (we don't hold wait_lock);
|
||||
* since we own the lock pi_state->owner == current is the
|
||||
* stable state, anything else needs more attention.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (q->pi_state->owner != current)
|
||||
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we didn't get the lock; check if anybody stole it from us. In
|
||||
* that case, we need to fix up the uval to point to them instead of
|
||||
* us, otherwise bad things happen. [10]
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Another speculative read; pi_state->owner == current is unstable
|
||||
* but needs our attention.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (q->pi_state->owner == current) {
|
||||
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Paranoia check. If we did not take the lock, then we should not be
|
||||
* the owner of the rt_mutex.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1290,6 +1290,19 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
|
||||
* unconditionally. Clean this up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Slow path try-lock function:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -1312,13 +1325,7 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
|
||||
* unconditionally. Clean this up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
ret = __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1505,6 +1512,11 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
|
||||
* the timeout structure is provided
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
extern int rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
|
||||
extern int __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
|
||||
extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче