UBI: misc comment fixes
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
3f5026222e
Коммит
be436f6238
|
@ -64,9 +64,9 @@
|
|||
* device, e.g., make @ubi->min_io_size = 512 in the example above?
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A: because when writing a sub-page, MTD still writes a full 2K page but the
|
||||
* bytes which are no relevant to the sub-page are 0xFF. So, basically, writing
|
||||
* 4x512 sub-pages is 4 times slower than writing one 2KiB NAND page. Thus, we
|
||||
* prefer to use sub-pages only for EV and VID headers.
|
||||
* bytes which are not relevant to the sub-page are 0xFF. So, basically,
|
||||
* writing 4x512 sub-pages is 4 times slower than writing one 2KiB NAND page.
|
||||
* Thus, we prefer to use sub-pages only for EC and VID headers.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As it was noted above, the VID header may start at a non-aligned offset.
|
||||
* For example, in case of a 2KiB page NAND flash with a 512 bytes sub-page,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static struct ubi_vtbl_record *process_lvol(struct ubi_device *ubi,
|
|||
* 0 contains more recent information.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So the plan is to first check LEB 0. Then
|
||||
* a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most resent data; then
|
||||
* a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most recent data; then
|
||||
* we compare it with LEB 1, and if they are different, we copy LEB
|
||||
* 0 to LEB 1;
|
||||
* b. if LEB 0 is corrupted, but LEB 1 has to be OK, and we copy LEB 1
|
||||
|
@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ int ubi_read_volume_table(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si)
|
|||
goto out_free;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get sure that the scanning information is consistent to the
|
||||
* Make sure that the scanning information is consistent to the
|
||||
* information stored in the volume table.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
err = check_scanning_info(ubi, si);
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче