btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT
Our lockdep maps are based on rootid+level, however in some cases we will lock adjacent blocks on the same level, namely in searching forward or in split/balance. Because of this lockdep will complain, so we need a separate subclass to indicate to lockdep that these are different locks. lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW split leaf lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT lock right -> BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT The above graph illustrates the need for this new nesting subclass. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
9631e4cc1a
Коммит
bf77467a93
|
@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
left = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (left) {
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(left);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
|
||||
wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, left,
|
||||
parent, pslot - 1, &left,
|
||||
|
@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
right = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (right) {
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(right);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
|
||||
wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, right,
|
||||
parent, pslot + 1, &right,
|
||||
|
@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
if (left) {
|
||||
u32 left_nr;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(left);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
|
||||
|
||||
left_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(left);
|
||||
|
@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
if (right) {
|
||||
u32 right_nr;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(right);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
|
||||
|
||||
right_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(right);
|
||||
|
@ -3806,7 +3806,7 @@ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(right))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(right);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
|
||||
|
||||
free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(right);
|
||||
|
@ -4045,7 +4045,7 @@ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(left))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_tree_lock(left);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
|
||||
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
|
||||
|
||||
free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(left);
|
||||
|
@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ again:
|
|||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
|
||||
path->recurse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
|
||||
|
@ -5504,7 +5504,7 @@ again:
|
|||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
|
||||
path->recurse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_COW,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Oftentimes we need to lock adjacent nodes on the same level while
|
||||
* still holding the lock on the original node we searched to, such as
|
||||
* for searching forward or for split/balance.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Because of this we need to indicate to lockdep that this is
|
||||
* acceptable by having a different subclass for each of these
|
||||
* operations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are limited to MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBLCLASSES number of subclasses, so
|
||||
* add this in here and add a static_assert to keep us from going over
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче