irqchip/exiu: Fix acknowledgment of edge triggered interrupts
[ Upstream commit4efc851c36
] Currently the EXIU uses the fasteoi interrupt flow that is configured by it's parent (irq-gic-v3.c). With this flow the only chance to clear the interrupt request happens during .irq_eoi() and (obviously) this happens after the interrupt handler has run. EXIU requires edge triggered interrupts to be acked prior to interrupt handling. Without this we risk incorrect interrupt dismissal when a new interrupt is delivered after the handler reads and acknowledges the peripheral but before the irq_eoi() takes place. Fix this by clearing the interrupt request from .irq_ack() if we are configured for edge triggered interrupts. This requires adopting the fasteoi-ack flow instead of the fasteoi to ensure the ack gets called. These changes have been tested using the power button on a Developerbox/SC2A11 combined with some hackery in gpio-keys so I can play with the different trigger mode [and an mdelay(500) so I can can check what happens on a double click in both modes]. Fixes:706cffc1b9
("irqchip/exiu: Add support for Socionext Synquacer EXIU controller") Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220503134541.2566457-1-daniel.thompson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
737b14e490
Коммит
c1cfb6f652
|
@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ config ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA
|
|||
|
||||
config ARCH_SYNQUACER
|
||||
bool "Socionext SynQuacer SoC Family"
|
||||
select IRQ_FASTEOI_HIERARCHY_HANDLERS
|
||||
|
||||
config ARCH_TEGRA
|
||||
bool "NVIDIA Tegra SoC Family"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,11 +37,26 @@ struct exiu_irq_data {
|
|||
u32 spi_base;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void exiu_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
|
||||
static void exiu_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct exiu_irq_data *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
|
||||
|
||||
writel(BIT(d->hwirq), data->base + EIREQCLR);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void exiu_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct exiu_irq_data *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Level triggered interrupts are latched and must be cleared during
|
||||
* EOI or the interrupt will be jammed on. Of course if a level
|
||||
* triggered interrupt is still asserted then the write will not clear
|
||||
* the interrupt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (irqd_is_level_type(d))
|
||||
writel(BIT(d->hwirq), data->base + EIREQCLR);
|
||||
|
||||
irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -91,10 +106,13 @@ static int exiu_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
|
|||
writel_relaxed(val, data->base + EILVL);
|
||||
|
||||
val = readl_relaxed(data->base + EIEDG);
|
||||
if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
|
||||
if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) {
|
||||
val &= ~BIT(d->hwirq);
|
||||
else
|
||||
irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_fasteoi_irq);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
val |= BIT(d->hwirq);
|
||||
irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_fasteoi_ack_irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
writel_relaxed(val, data->base + EIEDG);
|
||||
|
||||
writel_relaxed(BIT(d->hwirq), data->base + EIREQCLR);
|
||||
|
@ -104,6 +122,7 @@ static int exiu_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
|
|||
|
||||
static struct irq_chip exiu_irq_chip = {
|
||||
.name = "EXIU",
|
||||
.irq_ack = exiu_irq_ack,
|
||||
.irq_eoi = exiu_irq_eoi,
|
||||
.irq_enable = exiu_irq_enable,
|
||||
.irq_mask = exiu_irq_mask,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче