From 18d405af30bf6506bf2fc49056de7691c949812e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:34:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] bpf, arm32: fix to use bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro api Any eBPF JIT that where its underlying arch supports ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY would need to use bpf_jit_binary_{un,}lock_ro() pair instead of the set_memory_{ro,rw}() pair directly as otherwise changes to the former might break. arm32's eBPF conversion missed to change it, so fix this up here. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c index 6e8b71613039..f6a62ae44a65 100644 --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) /* there are 2 passes here */ bpf_jit_dump(prog->len, image_size, 2, ctx.target); - set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages); + bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(header); prog->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; prog->jited = 1; prog->jited_len = image_size; From f605ce5eb26ac934fb8106d75d46a2c875a2bf23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:34:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] bpf, s390: fix potential memleak when later bpf_jit_prog fails If we would ever fail in the bpf_jit_prog() pass that writes the actual insns to the image after we got header via bpf_jit_binary_alloc() then we also need to make sure to free it through bpf_jit_binary_free() again when bailing out. Given we had prior bpf_jit_prog() passes to initially probe for clobbered registers, program size and to fill in addrs arrray for jump targets, this is more of a theoretical one, but at least make sure this doesn't break with future changes. Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index d2db8acb1a55..5f0234ec8038 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) goto free_addrs; } if (bpf_jit_prog(&jit, fp)) { + bpf_jit_binary_free(header); fp = orig_fp; goto free_addrs; } From 85782e037f8aba8922dadb24a1523ca0b82ab8bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:34:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] bpf: undo prog rejection on read-only lock failure Partially undo commit 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") since it caused a regression, that is, syzkaller was able to manage to cause a panic via fault injection deep in set_memory_ro() path by letting an allocation fail: In x86's __change_page_attr_set_clr() it was able to change the attributes of the primary mapping but not in the alias mapping via cpa_process_alias(), so the second, inner call to the __change_page_attr() via __change_page_attr_set_clr() had to split a larger page and failed in the alloc_pages() with the artifically triggered allocation error which is then propagated down to the call site. Thus, for set_memory_ro() this means that it returned with an error, but from debugging a probe_kernel_write() revealed EFAULT on that memory since the primary mapping succeeded to get changed. Therefore the subsequent hdr->locked = 0 reset triggered the panic as it was performed on read-only memory, so call-site assumptions were infact wrong to assume that it would either succeed /or/ not succeed at all since there's no such rollback in set_memory_*() calls from partial change of mappings, in other words, we're left in a state that is "half done". A later undo via set_memory_rw() is succeeding though due to matching permissions on that part (aka due to the try_preserve_large_page() succeeding). While reproducing locally with explicitly triggering this error, the initial splitting only happens on rare occasions and in real world it would additionally need oom conditions, but that said, it could partially fail. Therefore, it is definitely wrong to bail out on set_memory_ro() error and reject the program with the set_memory_*() semantics we have today. Shouldn't have gone the extra mile since no other user in tree today infact checks for any set_memory_*() errors, e.g. neither module_enable_ro() / module_disable_ro() for module RO/NX handling which is mostly default these days nor kprobes core with alloc_insn_page() / free_insn_page() as examples that could be invoked long after bootup and original 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks") did neither when it got first introduced to BPF so "improving" with bailing out was clearly not right when set_memory_*() cannot handle it today. Kees suggested that if set_memory_*() can fail, we should annotate it with __must_check, and all callers need to deal with it gracefully given those set_memory_*() markings aren't "advisory", but they're expected to actually do what they say. This might be an option worth to move forward in future but would at the same time require that set_memory_*() calls from supporting archs are guaranteed to be "atomic" in that they provide rollback if part of the range fails, once that happened, the transition from RW -> RO could be made more robust that way, while subsequent RO -> RW transition /must/ continue guaranteeing to always succeed the undo part. Reported-by: syzbot+a4eb8c7766952a1ca872@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+d866d1925855328eac3b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") Cc: Laura Abbott Cc: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/linux/filter.h | 56 ++++++------------------------------------ kernel/bpf/core.c | 28 --------------------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 20f2659dd829..300baad62c88 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -470,9 +470,7 @@ struct sock_fprog_kern { }; struct bpf_binary_header { - u16 pages; - u16 locked:1; - + u32 pages; /* Some arches need word alignment for their instructions */ u8 image[] __aligned(4); }; @@ -481,7 +479,7 @@ struct bpf_prog { u16 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */ u16 jited:1, /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */ jit_requested:1,/* archs need to JIT the prog */ - locked:1, /* Program image locked? */ + undo_set_mem:1, /* Passed set_memory_ro() checkpoint */ gpl_compatible:1, /* Is filter GPL compatible? */ cb_access:1, /* Is control block accessed? */ dst_needed:1, /* Do we need dst entry? */ @@ -677,46 +675,24 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default) static inline void bpf_prog_lock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) { -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY - fp->locked = 1; - if (set_memory_ro((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages)) - fp->locked = 0; -#endif + fp->undo_set_mem = 1; + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); } static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) { -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY - if (fp->locked) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(set_memory_rw((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages)); - /* In case set_memory_rw() fails, we want to be the first - * to crash here instead of some random place later on. - */ - fp->locked = 0; - } -#endif + if (fp->undo_set_mem) + set_memory_rw((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); } static inline void bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) { -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY - hdr->locked = 1; - if (set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages)) - hdr->locked = 0; -#endif + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); } static inline void bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) { -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY - if (hdr->locked) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(set_memory_rw((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages)); - /* In case set_memory_rw() fails, we want to be the first - * to crash here instead of some random place later on. - */ - hdr->locked = 0; - } -#endif + set_memory_rw((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); } static inline struct bpf_binary_header * @@ -728,22 +704,6 @@ bpf_jit_binary_hdr(const struct bpf_prog *fp) return (void *)addr; } -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY -static inline int bpf_prog_check_pages_ro_single(const struct bpf_prog *fp) -{ - if (!fp->locked) - return -ENOLCK; - if (fp->jited) { - const struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(fp); - - if (!hdr->locked) - return -ENOLCK; - } - - return 0; -} -#endif - int sk_filter_trim_cap(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int cap); static inline int sk_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index a9e6c04d0f4a..1e5625d46414 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -598,8 +598,6 @@ bpf_jit_binary_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr, bpf_fill_ill_insns(hdr, size); hdr->pages = size / PAGE_SIZE; - hdr->locked = 0; - hole = min_t(unsigned int, size - (proglen + sizeof(*hdr)), PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*hdr)); start = (get_random_int() % hole) & ~(alignment - 1); @@ -1450,22 +1448,6 @@ static int bpf_check_tail_call(const struct bpf_prog *fp) return 0; } -static int bpf_prog_check_pages_ro_locked(const struct bpf_prog *fp) -{ -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY - int i, err; - - for (i = 0; i < fp->aux->func_cnt; i++) { - err = bpf_prog_check_pages_ro_single(fp->aux->func[i]); - if (err) - return err; - } - - return bpf_prog_check_pages_ro_single(fp); -#endif - return 0; -} - static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct bpf_prog *fp) { #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON @@ -1524,17 +1506,7 @@ finalize: * all eBPF JITs might immediately support all features. */ *err = bpf_check_tail_call(fp); - if (*err) - return fp; - /* Checkpoint: at this point onwards any cBPF -> eBPF or - * native eBPF program is read-only. If we failed to change - * the page attributes (e.g. allocation failure from - * splitting large pages), then reject the whole program - * in order to guarantee not ending up with any W+X pages - * from BPF side in kernel. - */ - *err = bpf_prog_check_pages_ro_locked(fp); return fp; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_select_runtime);