From cd68f6bd53cf89d1d5ed889b8af65e9c3574a079 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiang Liu Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:11:52 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI The IOAPIC has logic to track IOAPIC pin status, so there's no need for special treatment for GSI used by ACPI SCI in function mp_register_gsi() and mp_unregister_gsi(). Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Joerg Roedel Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Len Brown Cc: Pavel Machek Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414397531-28254-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c index ddddaed91872..4433a4be8171 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c @@ -408,10 +408,6 @@ static int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC) return gsi; - /* Don't set up the ACPI SCI because it's already set up */ - if (acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt == gsi) - return mp_map_gsi_to_irq(gsi, IOAPIC_MAP_ALLOC); - trigger = trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1; polarity = polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1; node = dev ? dev_to_node(dev) : NUMA_NO_NODE; @@ -424,7 +420,8 @@ static int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, if (irq < 0) return irq; - if (enable_update_mptable) + /* Don't set up the ACPI SCI because it's already set up */ + if (enable_update_mptable && acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt != gsi) mp_config_acpi_gsi(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity); return irq; @@ -437,9 +434,6 @@ static void mp_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi) if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC) return; - if (acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt == gsi) - return; - irq = mp_map_gsi_to_irq(gsi, 0); if (irq > 0) mp_unmap_irq(irq);