signal/powerpc: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE and SIGTRAP
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME and TRAP_FIXME, siginfo_layout() will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Ref: 9bad068c24d7 ("[PATCH] ppc32: support for e500 and 85xx") Ref: 0ed70f6105ef ("PPC32: Provide proper siginfo information on various exceptions.") History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
b80328be53
Коммит
cf4674c46c
|
@ -18,4 +18,19 @@
|
|||
#undef NSIGTRAP
|
||||
#define NSIGTRAP 4
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* SIGFPE si_codes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef __KERNEL__
|
||||
#define FPE_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */
|
||||
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* SIGTRAP si_codes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef __KERNEL__
|
||||
#define TRAP_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */
|
||||
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SIGINFO_H */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ void unknown_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
printk("Bad trap at PC: %lx, SR: %lx, vector=%lx\n",
|
||||
regs->nip, regs->msr, regs->trap);
|
||||
|
||||
_exception(SIGTRAP, regs, 0, 0);
|
||||
_exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_FIXME, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
exception_exit(prev_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ bail:
|
|||
|
||||
void RunModeException(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
_exception(SIGTRAP, regs, 0, 0);
|
||||
_exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_FIXME, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void single_step_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
|
@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static void emulate_single_step(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
|
||||
static inline int __parse_fpscr(unsigned long fpscr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
int ret = FPE_FIXME;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Invalid operation */
|
||||
if ((fpscr & FPSCR_VE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_VX))
|
||||
|
@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointException(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
extern int do_spe_mathemu(struct pt_regs *regs);
|
||||
unsigned long spefscr;
|
||||
int fpexc_mode;
|
||||
int code = 0;
|
||||
int code = FPE_FIXME;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
flush_spe_to_thread(current);
|
||||
|
@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointRoundException(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
printk(KERN_ERR "unrecognized spe instruction "
|
||||
"in %s at %lx\n", current->comm, regs->nip);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
_exception(SIGFPE, regs, 0, regs->nip);
|
||||
_exception(SIGFPE, regs, FPE_FIXME, regs->nip);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче