bpf: bpf_lock on kallsysms doesn't need to be irqsave

Hannes rightfully spotted that the bpf_lock doesn't need to be
irqsave variant. We never perform any such updates where this
would be necessary (neither right now nor in future), therefore
relax this further.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Hannes Frederic Sowa 2017-04-27 01:39:33 +02:00 коммит произвёл David S. Miller
Родитель 728a853a44
Коммит d24f7c7fb9
1 изменённых файлов: 4 добавлений и 8 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -394,27 +394,23 @@ static bool bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(const struct bpf_prog *fp)
void bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(struct bpf_prog *fp)
{
unsigned long flags;
if (!bpf_prog_kallsyms_candidate(fp) ||
!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bpf_lock, flags);
spin_lock_bh(&bpf_lock);
bpf_prog_ksym_node_add(fp->aux);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bpf_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&bpf_lock);
}
void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del(struct bpf_prog *fp)
{
unsigned long flags;
if (!bpf_prog_kallsyms_candidate(fp))
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bpf_lock, flags);
spin_lock_bh(&bpf_lock);
bpf_prog_ksym_node_del(fp->aux);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bpf_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&bpf_lock);
}
static struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_kallsyms_find(unsigned long addr)