l2tp: prefer using BIT macro
Use BIT(x) rather than (1<<x), reported by checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
bef04d162c
Коммит
dbf82f3fac
|
@ -21,11 +21,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
/* Per tunnel, session hash table size */
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_BITS 4
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_SIZE (1 << L2TP_HASH_BITS)
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_SIZE BIT(L2TP_HASH_BITS)
|
||||
|
||||
/* System-wide, session hash table size */
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_BITS_2 8
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_SIZE_2 (1 << L2TP_HASH_BITS_2)
|
||||
#define L2TP_HASH_SIZE_2 BIT(L2TP_HASH_BITS_2)
|
||||
|
||||
struct sk_buff;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче