selftests: pmtu: Introduce list_flush_ipv4_exception test case
This test checks that route exceptions can be successfully listed and flushed using ip -6 route {list,flush} cache. v7: No changes v6: - Merge this patch into series including fix, as it's also targeted for net-next - Drop left-over print of 'ip route list cache | wc -l' Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
40cb35d5dc
Коммит
de755a8513
|
@ -112,6 +112,10 @@
|
|||
# - cleanup_ipv6_exception
|
||||
# Same as above, but use IPv6 transport from A to B
|
||||
#
|
||||
# - list_flush_ipv4_exception
|
||||
# Using the same topology as in pmtu_ipv4, create exceptions, and check
|
||||
# they are shown when listing exception caches, gone after flushing them
|
||||
#
|
||||
# - list_flush_ipv6_exception
|
||||
# Using the same topology as in pmtu_ipv6, create exceptions, and check
|
||||
# they are shown when listing exception caches, gone after flushing them
|
||||
|
@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ tests="
|
|||
pmtu_vti6_link_change_mtu vti6: MTU changes on link changes 0
|
||||
cleanup_ipv4_exception ipv4: cleanup of cached exceptions 1
|
||||
cleanup_ipv6_exception ipv6: cleanup of cached exceptions 1
|
||||
list_flush_ipv4_exception ipv4: list and flush cached exceptions 1
|
||||
list_flush_ipv6_exception ipv6: list and flush cached exceptions 1"
|
||||
|
||||
NS_A="ns-A"
|
||||
|
@ -1207,6 +1212,61 @@ run_test_nh() {
|
|||
USE_NH=no
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test_list_flush_ipv4_exception() {
|
||||
setup namespaces routing || return 2
|
||||
trace "${ns_a}" veth_A-R1 "${ns_r1}" veth_R1-A \
|
||||
"${ns_r1}" veth_R1-B "${ns_b}" veth_B-R1 \
|
||||
"${ns_a}" veth_A-R2 "${ns_r2}" veth_R2-A \
|
||||
"${ns_r2}" veth_R2-B "${ns_b}" veth_B-R2
|
||||
|
||||
dst_prefix1="${prefix4}.${b_r1}."
|
||||
dst2="${prefix4}.${b_r2}.1"
|
||||
|
||||
# Set up initial MTU values
|
||||
mtu "${ns_a}" veth_A-R1 2000
|
||||
mtu "${ns_r1}" veth_R1-A 2000
|
||||
mtu "${ns_r1}" veth_R1-B 1500
|
||||
mtu "${ns_b}" veth_B-R1 1500
|
||||
|
||||
mtu "${ns_a}" veth_A-R2 2000
|
||||
mtu "${ns_r2}" veth_R2-A 2000
|
||||
mtu "${ns_r2}" veth_R2-B 1500
|
||||
mtu "${ns_b}" veth_B-R2 1500
|
||||
|
||||
fail=0
|
||||
|
||||
# Add 100 addresses for veth endpoint on B reached by default A route
|
||||
for i in $(seq 100 199); do
|
||||
run_cmd ${ns_b} ip addr add "${dst_prefix1}${i}" dev veth_B-R1
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
# Create 100 cached route exceptions for path via R1, one via R2. Note
|
||||
# that with IPv4 we need to actually cause a route lookup that matches
|
||||
# the exception caused by ICMP, in order to actually have a cached
|
||||
# route, so we need to ping each destination twice
|
||||
for i in $(seq 100 199); do
|
||||
run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -q -M want -i 0.1 -c 2 -s 1800 "${dst_prefix1}${i}"
|
||||
done
|
||||
run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -q -M want -i 0.1 -c 2 -s 1800 "${dst2}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Each exception is printed as two lines
|
||||
if [ "$(${ns_a} ip route list cache | wc -l)" -ne 202 ]; then
|
||||
err " can't list cached exceptions"
|
||||
fail=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
run_cmd ${ns_a} ip route flush cache
|
||||
pmtu1="$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception "${ns_a}" ${dst_prefix}1)"
|
||||
pmtu2="$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception "${ns_a}" ${dst_prefix}2)"
|
||||
if [ -n "${pmtu1}" ] || [ -n "${pmtu2}" ] || \
|
||||
[ -n "$(${ns_a} ip route list cache)" ]; then
|
||||
err " can't flush cached exceptions"
|
||||
fail=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
return ${fail}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test_list_flush_ipv6_exception() {
|
||||
setup namespaces routing || return 2
|
||||
trace "${ns_a}" veth_A-R1 "${ns_r1}" veth_R1-A \
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче