bonding: fix ASSERT_RTNL that produces spurious warnings

Move an ASSERT_RTNL down to where we should hold only RTNL;
the existing check produces spurious warnings because we hold additional
locks at _bh, tripping a debug warning in spin_lock_mutex().

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jay Vosburgh 2008-01-17 16:24:58 -08:00 коммит произвёл Jeff Garzik
Родитель e934dd7862
Коммит e0138a66e1
1 изменённых файлов: 2 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1601,9 +1601,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
struct slave *swap_slave;
int i;
if (new_slave)
ASSERT_RTNL();
if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
return;
}
@ -1649,6 +1646,8 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
ASSERT_RTNL();
/* curr_active_slave must be set before calling alb_swap_mac_addr */
if (swap_slave) {
/* swap mac address */