udp: ipv4: do not use sk_dst_lock from softirq context
Using sk_dst_lock from softirq context is not supported right now.
Instead of adding BH protection everywhere,
udp_sk_rx_dst_set() can instead use xchg(), as suggested
by David.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fixes: 9750223102
("udp: ipv4: must add synchronization in udp_sk_rx_dst_set()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
50dc875f2e
Коммит
e47eb5dfb2
|
@ -1600,20 +1600,15 @@ static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* For TCP sockets, sk_rx_dst is protected by socket lock
|
||||
* For UDP, we use sk_dst_lock to guard against concurrent changes.
|
||||
* For UDP, we use xchg() to guard against concurrent changes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void udp_sk_rx_dst_set(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dst_entry *old;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
|
||||
old = sk->sk_rx_dst;
|
||||
if (likely(old != dst)) {
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
|
||||
dst_release(old);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
old = xchg(&sk->sk_rx_dst, dst);
|
||||
dst_release(old);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче