From e4d6c4b79cc189c1b0d65f8e3875c4411e097bee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alessandro Rubini Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:05:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] FMC: support carriers with no mezzanine At registration and unregistration time, I was checking fmc->flags for FMC_DEVICE_NO_MEZZANINE, to skip initialization and cleanup for empty slots. The check was wrong ("==" instead of "&") but registration failed anyways (as expected) because we had no EEPROM. This commit fixes one such checks and removes the other, so to actually accept slots with no mezzanines. That's because the carrier may offer some support anyways (the SPEC does), and working on the carrier with no mezzanine-specific driver is common during development. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini Acked-by: Juan David Gonzalez Cobas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/fmc/fmc-core.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/fmc/fmc-core.c b/drivers/fmc/fmc-core.c index 24d52497524d..5a5e616c6324 100644 --- a/drivers/fmc/fmc-core.c +++ b/drivers/fmc/fmc-core.c @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int fmc_device_register_n(struct fmc_device **devs, int n) ret = -EINVAL; break; } - if (fmc->flags == FMC_DEVICE_NO_MEZZANINE) { + if (fmc->flags & FMC_DEVICE_NO_MEZZANINE) { dev_info(fmc->hwdev, "absent mezzanine in slot %d\n", fmc->slot_id); continue; @@ -189,9 +189,6 @@ int fmc_device_register_n(struct fmc_device **devs, int n) for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { fmc = devarray[i]; - if (fmc->flags == FMC_DEVICE_NO_MEZZANINE) - continue; /* dev_info already done above */ - fmc->nr_slots = n; /* each slot must know how many are there */ fmc->devarray = devarray; @@ -263,8 +260,6 @@ void fmc_device_unregister_n(struct fmc_device **devs, int n) kfree(devs[0]->devarray); for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { - if (devs[i]->flags == FMC_DEVICE_NO_MEZZANINE) - continue; sysfs_remove_bin_file(&devs[i]->dev.kobj, &fmc_eeprom_attr); device_del(&devs[i]->dev); fmc_free_id_info(devs[i]);