objtool: Update Retpoline validation
commit 9bb2ec608a
upstream.
Update retpoline validation with the new CONFIG_RETPOLINE requirement of
not having bare naked RET instructions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
[cascardo: conflict fixup at arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
a1d912d7ac
Коммит
e894b7817e
|
@ -75,6 +75,12 @@
|
|||
.popsection
|
||||
.endm
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* (ab)use RETPOLINE_SAFE on RET to annotate away 'bare' RET instructions
|
||||
* vs RETBleed validation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* JMP_NOSPEC and CALL_NOSPEC macros can be used instead of a simple
|
||||
* indirect jmp/call which may be susceptible to the Spectre variant 2
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(sme_encrypt_execute)
|
|||
pop %rbp
|
||||
|
||||
/* Offset to __x86_return_thunk would be wrong here */
|
||||
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
|
||||
ret
|
||||
int3
|
||||
SYM_FUNC_END(sme_encrypt_execute)
|
||||
|
@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__enc_copy)
|
|||
pop %r15
|
||||
|
||||
/* Offset to __x86_return_thunk would be wrong here */
|
||||
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
|
||||
ret
|
||||
int3
|
||||
.L__enc_copy_end:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(hypercall_page)
|
|||
.rept (PAGE_SIZE / 32)
|
||||
UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
|
||||
.skip 31, 0x90
|
||||
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
|
||||
RET
|
||||
.endr
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1894,8 +1894,9 @@ static int read_retpoline_hints(struct objtool_file *file)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) {
|
||||
WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not an indirect jump/call",
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC &&
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_RETURN) {
|
||||
WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not an indirect jump/call/ret",
|
||||
insn->sec, insn->offset);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3229,7 +3230,8 @@ static int validate_retpoline(struct objtool_file *file)
|
|||
|
||||
for_each_insn(file, insn) {
|
||||
if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC)
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC &&
|
||||
insn->type != INSN_RETURN)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (insn->retpoline_safe)
|
||||
|
@ -3244,9 +3246,14 @@ static int validate_retpoline(struct objtool_file *file)
|
|||
if (!strcmp(insn->sec->name, ".init.text") && !module)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (insn->type == INSN_RETURN) {
|
||||
WARN_FUNC("'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build",
|
||||
insn->sec, insn->offset);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
WARN_FUNC("indirect %s found in RETPOLINE build",
|
||||
insn->sec, insn->offset,
|
||||
insn->type == INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC ? "jump" : "call");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
warnings++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче