bpf: add test for the verifier equal logic bug
This is a test to verify that bpf: fix states equal logic for varlen access actually fixed the problem. The problem was if the register we added to our map register was UNKNOWN in both the false and true branches and the only thing that changed was the range then we'd incorrectly assume that the true branch was valid, which it really wasnt. This tests this case and properly fails without my fix in place and passes with it in place. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
ddf952a1e4
Коммит
e95489010b
|
@ -2660,6 +2660,29 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
|||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"invalid map access from else condition",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, MAX_ENTRIES-1, 1),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче