x86,static_call: Fix __static_call_return0 for i386
commit1cd5f059d9
upstream. Paolo reported that the instruction sequence that is used to replace: call __static_call_return0 namely: 66 66 48 31 c0 data16 data16 xor %rax,%rax decodes to something else on i386, namely: 66 66 48 data16 dec %ax 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax Which is a nonsensical sequence that happens to have the same outcome. *However* an important distinction is that it consists of 2 instructions which is a problem when the thing needs to be overwriten with a regular call instruction again. As such, replace the instruction with something that decodes the same on both i386 and x86_64. Fixes:3f2a8fc4b1
("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()") Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220318204419.GT8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
ff65057665
Коммит
f4f8b6d849
|
@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ enum insn_type {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* data16 data16 xorq %rax, %rax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %rax
|
||||
* The REX.W cancels the effect of any data16.
|
||||
* cs cs cs xorl %eax, %eax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %[er]ax
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x66, 0x66, 0x48, 0x31, 0xc0 };
|
||||
static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x31, 0xc0 };
|
||||
|
||||
static void __ref __static_call_transform(void *insn, enum insn_type type, void *func)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче