From f793aa53786668c9e0db5900f70f560e99d62fa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:36:54 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] block: relax when to modify the timeout timer Since we are now, by default, applying timer slack to expiry times, the logic for when to modify a timer in the block code is suboptimal. The block layer keeps a forward rolling timer per queue for all requests, and modifies this timer if a request has a shorter timeout than what the current expiry time is. However, this breaks down when our rounded timer values get applied slack. Then each new request ends up modifying the timer, since we're still a little in front of the timer + slack. Fix this by allowing a tolerance of HZ / 2, the timeout handling doesn't need to be very precise. This drastically cuts down the number of timer modifications we have to make. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-timeout.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-timeout.c b/block/blk-timeout.c index d96f7061c6fd..a09e8af8186c 100644 --- a/block/blk-timeout.c +++ b/block/blk-timeout.c @@ -199,8 +199,19 @@ void __blk_add_timer(struct request *req, struct list_head *timeout_list) expiry = round_jiffies_up(req->deadline); if (!timer_pending(&q->timeout) || - time_before(expiry, q->timeout.expires)) - mod_timer(&q->timeout, expiry); + time_before(expiry, q->timeout.expires)) { + unsigned long diff = q->timeout.expires - expiry; + + /* + * Due to added timer slack to group timers, the timer + * will often be a little in front of what we asked for. + * So apply some tolerance here too, otherwise we keep + * modifying the timer because expires for value X + * will be X + something. + */ + if (diff >= HZ / 2) + mod_timer(&q->timeout, expiry); + } }