From f7f0d358f5f2f1133b5a14337028ddab848cd74e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:06:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: initialize error code There is one theoretical case that could fall through to using an uninitialized value as the return code. Let's give it a value of 0. Untested. Caught by Coverity. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c b/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c index cf49c22673b9..c23184a47fc4 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c @@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ static int sm_write(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev, { struct sm_ftl *ftl = dev->priv; struct ftl_zone *zone; - int error, zone_num, block, boffset; + int error = 0, zone_num, block, boffset; BUG_ON(ftl->readonly); sm_break_offset(ftl, sec_no << 9, &zone_num, &block, &boffset);