NFSv4.1: Replace dprintk() in pnfs_update_layout with something less buggy
Dereferencing nfsi->layout in order to read plh_flags without holding a spin lock is bug prone. Furthermore, the dprintk() tells you nothing about whether or not the call succeeded. Replace it with something that tells you about whether or not a valid layout segment was returned for the inode in question. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
78e4e05c64
Коммит
f86bbcf85d
|
@ -1027,17 +1027,15 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
|
|||
bool first = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!pnfs_enabled_sb(NFS_SERVER(ino)))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pnfs_within_mdsthreshold(ctx, ino, iomode))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
|
||||
lo = pnfs_find_alloc_layout(ino, ctx, gfp_flags);
|
||||
if (lo == NULL) {
|
||||
dprintk("%s ERROR: can't get pnfs_layout_hdr\n", __func__);
|
||||
if (lo == NULL)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do we even need to bother with this? */
|
||||
if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags)) {
|
||||
|
@ -1093,8 +1091,14 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
|
|||
atomic_dec(&lo->plh_outstanding);
|
||||
pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
dprintk("%s end, state 0x%lx lseg %p\n", __func__,
|
||||
nfsi->layout ? nfsi->layout->plh_flags : -1, lseg);
|
||||
dprintk("%s: inode %s/%llu pNFS layout segment %s for "
|
||||
"(%s, offset: %llu, length: %llu)\n",
|
||||
__func__, ino->i_sb->s_id,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)NFS_FILEID(ino),
|
||||
lseg == NULL ? "not found" : "found",
|
||||
iomode==IOMODE_RW ? "read/write" : "read-only",
|
||||
(unsigned long long)pos,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)count);
|
||||
return lseg;
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче