Btrfs: fix btrfs_write_inode vs delayed iput deadlock
commit3c4276936f
upstream. We recently ran into the following deadlock involving btrfs_write_inode(): [ +0.005066] __schedule+0x38e/0x8c0 [ +0.007144] schedule+0x36/0x80 [ +0.006447] bit_wait+0x11/0x60 [ +0.006446] __wait_on_bit+0xbe/0x110 [ +0.007487] ? bit_wait_io+0x60/0x60 [ +0.007319] __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x96/0xc0 [ +0.009568] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40 [ +0.009565] inode_wait_for_writeback+0x21/0x30 [ +0.009224] evict+0xb0/0x190 [ +0.006099] iput+0x1a8/0x210 [ +0.006103] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x73/0xc0 [ +0.009047] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x799/0x8c0 [ +0.009567] btrfs_write_inode+0x81/0xb0 [ +0.008008] __writeback_single_inode+0x267/0x320 [ +0.009569] writeback_sb_inodes+0x25b/0x4e0 [ +0.008702] wb_writeback+0x102/0x2d0 [ +0.007487] wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310 [ +0.006794] ? wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310 [ +0.007143] process_one_work+0x150/0x410 [ +0.008179] worker_thread+0x6d/0x520 [ +0.007490] kthread+0x12c/0x160 [ +0.006620] ? put_pwq_unlocked+0x80/0x80 [ +0.008185] ? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0 [ +0.007484] ? do_syscall_64+0x53/0x150 [ +0.007837] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40 Writeback calls: btrfs_write_inode btrfs_commit_transaction btrfs_run_delayed_iputs If iput() is called on that same inode, evict() will wait for writeback forever. btrfs_write_inode() was originally added way back in4730a4bc5b
("btrfs_dirty_inode") to support O_SYNC writes. However, ->write_inode() hasn't been used for O_SYNC since148f948ba8
("vfs: Introduce new helpers for syncing after writing to O_SYNC file or IS_SYNC inode"), so btrfs_write_inode() is actually unnecessary (and leads to a bunch of unnecessary commits). Get rid of it, which also gets rid of the deadlock. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.2+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> [Omar: new commit message] Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
e7457f97d2
Коммит
f91ca31f53
|
@ -6152,32 +6152,6 @@ err:
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int btrfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
|
||||
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
bool nolock = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_DUMMY, &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (btrfs_fs_closing(root->fs_info) &&
|
||||
btrfs_is_free_space_inode(BTRFS_I(inode)))
|
||||
nolock = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) {
|
||||
if (nolock)
|
||||
trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root);
|
||||
else
|
||||
trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(trans))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(trans);
|
||||
ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is somewhat expensive, updating the tree every time the
|
||||
* inode changes. But, it is most likely to find the inode in cache.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2271,7 +2271,6 @@ static const struct super_operations btrfs_super_ops = {
|
|||
.sync_fs = btrfs_sync_fs,
|
||||
.show_options = btrfs_show_options,
|
||||
.show_devname = btrfs_show_devname,
|
||||
.write_inode = btrfs_write_inode,
|
||||
.alloc_inode = btrfs_alloc_inode,
|
||||
.destroy_inode = btrfs_destroy_inode,
|
||||
.statfs = btrfs_statfs,
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче