Btrfs: try to only do one btrfs_search_slot in do_setxattr
I've been watching how many btrfs_search_slot()'s we do and I noticed that when we create a file with selinux enabled we were doing 2 each time we initialize the security context. That's because we lookup the xattr first so we can delete it if we're setting a new value to an existing xattr. But in the create case we don't have any xattrs, so it is completely useless to have the extra lookup. So re-arrange things so that we only lookup first if we specifically have XATTR_REPLACE. That way in the basic case we only do 1 search, and in the more complicated case we do the normal 2 lookups. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
149e2d76b4
Коммит
fa09200b83
|
@ -89,13 +89,8 @@ int btrfs_insert_xattr_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
data_size = sizeof(*dir_item) + name_len + data_len;
|
||||
dir_item = insert_with_overflow(trans, root, path, &key, data_size,
|
||||
name, name_len);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* FIXME: at some point we should handle xattr's that are larger than
|
||||
* what we can fit in our leaf. We set location to NULL b/c we arent
|
||||
* pointing at anything else, that will change if we store the xattr
|
||||
* data in a separate inode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BUG_ON(IS_ERR(dir_item));
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(dir_item))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(dir_item);
|
||||
memset(&location, 0, sizeof(location));
|
||||
|
||||
leaf = path->nodes[0];
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -102,43 +102,57 @@ static int do_setxattr(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
if (!path)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
/* first lets see if we already have this xattr */
|
||||
di = btrfs_lookup_xattr(trans, root, path, btrfs_ino(inode), name,
|
||||
strlen(name), -1);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(di)) {
|
||||
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ok we already have this xattr, lets remove it */
|
||||
if (di) {
|
||||
/* if we want create only exit */
|
||||
if (flags & XATTR_CREATE) {
|
||||
ret = -EEXIST;
|
||||
if (flags & XATTR_REPLACE) {
|
||||
di = btrfs_lookup_xattr(trans, root, path, btrfs_ino(inode), name,
|
||||
name_len, -1);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(di)) {
|
||||
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
|
||||
BUG_ON(ret);
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
|
||||
/* if we don't have a value then we are removing the xattr */
|
||||
if (!value)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & XATTR_REPLACE) {
|
||||
/* we couldn't find the attr to replace */
|
||||
} else if (!di) {
|
||||
ret = -ENODATA;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ok we have to create a completely new xattr */
|
||||
again:
|
||||
ret = btrfs_insert_xattr_item(trans, root, path, btrfs_ino(inode),
|
||||
name, name_len, value, size);
|
||||
BUG_ON(ret);
|
||||
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
|
||||
if (flags & XATTR_CREATE)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can't use the path we already have since we won't have the
|
||||
* proper locking for a delete, so release the path and
|
||||
* re-lookup to delete the thing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
di = btrfs_lookup_xattr(trans, root, path, btrfs_ino(inode),
|
||||
name, name_len, -1);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(di)) {
|
||||
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
} else if (!di) {
|
||||
/* Shouldn't happen but just in case... */
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have a value to set, so go back and try to insert it now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (value) {
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
btrfs_free_path(path);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче