nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found
nfsd4_lockt does a search for a lockstateowner when building the lock struct to test. If one is found, it'll set fl_owner to it. Regardless of whether that happens, it'll also set fl_lmops. Given that this lock is basically a "lightweight" lock that's just used for checking conflicts, setting fl_lmops is probably not appropriate for it. This behavior exposed a bug in DLM's GETLK implementation where it wasn't clearing out the fields in the file_lock before filling in conflicting lock info. While we were able to fix this in DLM, it still seems pointless and dangerous to set the fl_lmops this way when we may have a NULL lockstateowner. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@pig.fieldses.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
b914152a6f
Коммит
fa82a49127
|
@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
|
|||
file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockt->lt_stateowner;
|
||||
file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid;
|
||||
file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
|
||||
file_lock.fl_lmops = &nfsd_posix_mng_ops;
|
||||
|
||||
file_lock.fl_start = lockt->lt_offset;
|
||||
file_lock.fl_end = last_byte_offset(lockt->lt_offset, lockt->lt_length);
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче