cpuidle: reduce code duplication inside cpuidle_idle_call()

We are doing this twice in cpuidle_idle_call() routine:
	drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP

Would be better if we actually store this in a local variable and
use that. That reduces code duplication and likely makes this piece
of code run faster (in case the compiler wasn't able to optimize it
earlier)

[rjw: Cast the result of bitwise AND to bool explicitly using !!]
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2013-10-03 21:26:48 +05:30 коммит произвёл Rafael J. Wysocki
Родитель 9b29a86f04
Коммит fb11c9c63f
1 изменённых файлов: 5 добавлений и 2 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
int next_state, entered_state;
bool broadcast;
if (off || !initialized)
return -ENODEV;
@ -141,7 +142,9 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP)
broadcast = !!(drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
if (broadcast)
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER,
&dev->cpu);
@ -151,7 +154,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
else
entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state);
if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP)
if (broadcast)
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT,
&dev->cpu);