Граф коммитов

9 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Valentin Schneider b2f6662ac0 PM: cpu: Make notifier chain use a raw_spinlock_t
Invoking atomic_notifier_chain_notify() requires acquiring a spinlock_t,
which can block under CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. Notifications for members of the
cpu_pm notification chain will be issued by the idle task, which can never
block.

Making *all* atomic_notifiers use a raw_spinlock is too big of a hammer, as
only notifications issued by the idle task are problematic.

Special-case cpu_pm_notifier_chain by kludging a raw_notifier and
raw_spinlock_t together, matching the atomic_notifier behavior with a
raw_spinlock_t.

Fixes: 70d9329857 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern")
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-08-16 18:55:32 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 70d9329857 notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern
The current notifiers have the following error handling pattern all
over the place:

	int err, nr;

	err = __foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_up, v, -1, &nr);
	if (err & NOTIFIER_STOP_MASK)
		__foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_down, v, nr-1, NULL)

And aside from the endless repetition thereof, it is broken. Consider
blocking notifiers; both calls take and drop the rwsem, this means
that the notifier list can change in between the two calls, making @nr
meaningless.

Fix this by replacing all the __foo_notifier_call_chain() functions
with foo_notifier_call_chain_robust() that embeds the above pattern,
but ensures it is inside a single lock region.

Note: I switched atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust() to use
      the spinlock, since RCU cannot provide the guarantee
      required for the recovery.

Note: software_resume() error handling was broken afaict.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818135804.325626653@infradead.org
2020-09-01 09:58:03 +02:00
Douglas Anderson b5945214b7 kernel/cpu_pm: Fix uninitted local in cpu_pm
cpu_pm_notify() is basically a wrapper of notifier_call_chain().
notifier_call_chain() doesn't initialize *nr_calls to 0 before it
starts incrementing it--presumably it's up to the callers to do this.

Unfortunately the callers of cpu_pm_notify() don't init *nr_calls.
This potentially means you could get too many or two few calls to
CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED or CPU_CLUSTER_PM_ENTER_FAILED depending on the
luck of the stack.

Let's fix this.

Fixes: ab10023e00 ("cpu_pm: Add cpu power management notifiers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200504104917.v6.3.I2d44fc0053d019f239527a4e5829416714b7e299@changeid
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
2020-05-15 11:44:34 -07:00
Thomas Gleixner 9c92ab6191 treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 282
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this software is licensed under the terms of the gnu general public
  license version 2 as published by the free software foundation and
  may be copied distributed and modified under those terms this
  program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but
  without any warranty without even the implied warranty of
  merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu
  general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 285 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190529141900.642774971@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-05 17:36:37 +02:00
Alex Shi 313c8c16ee PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier
This patch replaces an rwlock and raw notifier by an atomic notifier
protected by a spin_lock and RCU.

The main reason for this change is due to a 'scheduling while atomic'
bug with RT kernels on ARM/ARM64. On ARM/ARM64, the rwlock
cpu_pm_notifier_lock in cpu_pm_enter/exit() causes a potential
schedule after IRQ disable in the idle call chain:

cpu_startup_entry
  cpu_idle_loop
    local_irq_disable()
    cpuidle_idle_call
      call_cpuidle
        cpuidle_enter
          cpuidle_enter_state
            ->enter :arm_enter_idle_state
              cpu_pm_enter/exit
                CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER
                  read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); <-- sleep in idle
                     __rt_spin_lock();
                        schedule();

The kernel panic is here:
[    4.609601] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0/0x00000002
[    4.609608] [<ffff0000086fae70>] arm_enter_idle_state+0x18/0x70
[    4.609614] Modules linked in:
[    4.609615] [<ffff0000086f9298>] cpuidle_enter_state+0xf0/0x218
[    4.609620] [<ffff0000086f93f8>] cpuidle_enter+0x18/0x20
[    4.609626] Preemption disabled at:
[    4.609627] [<ffff0000080fa234>] call_cpuidle+0x24/0x40
[    4.609635] [<ffff000008882fa4>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x1c/0x28
[    4.609639] [<ffff0000080fa49c>] cpu_startup_entry+0x154/0x1f8
[    4.609645] [<ffff00000808e004>] secondary_start_kernel+0x15c/0x1a0

Daniel Lezcano said this notification is needed on arm/arm64 platforms.
Sebastian suggested using atomic_notifier instead of rwlock, which is not
only removing the sleeping in idle, but also improving latency.

Tony Lindgren found a miss use that rcu_read_lock used after rcu_idle_enter
Paul McKenney suggested trying RCU_NONIDLE.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-31 13:09:49 +02:00
Lina Iyer 21dd33b09c kernel/cpu_pm: fix cpu_cluster_pm_exit comment
cpu_cluster_pm_exit() must be sent after cpu_cluster_pm_enter() has been
sent for the cluster and before any cpu_pm_exit() notifications are sent
for any CPU.

Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-03 02:42:20 +02:00
Nicolas Pitre d84970bbaf kernel/cpu_pm.c: fix various typos
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-31 17:49:27 -07:00
Colin Cross 6f3eaec87b cpu_pm: call notifiers during suspend
Implements syscore_ops in cpu_pm to call the cpu and
cpu cluster notifiers during suspend and resume,
allowing drivers receiving the notifications to
avoid implementing syscore_ops.

Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
2011-09-23 12:05:29 +05:30
Colin Cross ab10023e00 cpu_pm: Add cpu power management notifiers
During some CPU power modes entered during idle, hotplug and
suspend, peripherals located in the CPU power domain, such as
the GIC, localtimers, and VFP, may be powered down.  Add a
notifier chain that allows drivers for those peripherals to
be notified before and after they may be reset.

Notified drivers can include VFP co-processor, interrupt controller
and it's PM extensions, local CPU timers context save/restore which
shouldn't be interrupted. Hence CPU PM event APIs  must be called
with interrupts disabled.

Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
2011-09-23 12:05:29 +05:30