Граф коммитов

11 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Marcin Slusarz 413d57c990 xfs: convert beX_add to beX_add_cpu (new common API)
remove beX_add functions and replace all uses with beX_add_cpu

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-13 16:21:19 -08:00
David Chinner 92821e2ba4 [XFS] Lazy Superblock Counters
When we have a couple of hundred transactions on the fly at once, they all
typically modify the on disk superblock in some way.
create/unclink/mkdir/rmdir modify inode counts, allocation/freeing modify
free block counts.

When these counts are modified in a transaction, they must eventually lock
the superblock buffer and apply the mods. The buffer then remains locked
until the transaction is committed into the incore log buffer. The result
of this is that with enough transactions on the fly the incore superblock
buffer becomes a bottleneck.

The result of contention on the incore superblock buffer is that
transaction rates fall - the more pressure that is put on the superblock
buffer, the slower things go.

The key to removing the contention is to not require the superblock fields
in question to be locked. We do that by not marking the superblock dirty
in the transaction. IOWs, we modify the incore superblock but do not
modify the cached superblock buffer. In short, we do not log superblock
modifications to critical fields in the superblock on every transaction.
In fact we only do it just before we write the superblock to disk every
sync period or just before unmount.

This creates an interesting problem - if we don't log or write out the
fields in every transaction, then how do the values get recovered after a
crash? the answer is simple - we keep enough duplicate, logged information
in other structures that we can reconstruct the correct count after log
recovery has been performed.

It is the AGF and AGI structures that contain the duplicate information;
after recovery, we walk every AGI and AGF and sum their individual
counters to get the correct value, and we do a transaction into the log to
correct them. An optimisation of this is that if we have a clean unmount
record, we know the value in the superblock is correct, so we can avoid
the summation walk under normal conditions and so mount/recovery times do
not change under normal operation.

One wrinkle that was discovered during development was that the blocks
used in the freespace btrees are never accounted for in the AGF counters.
This was once a valid optimisation to make; when the filesystem is full,
the free space btrees are empty and consume no space. Hence when it
matters, the "accounting" is correct. But that means the when we do the
AGF summations, we would not have a correct count and xfs_check would
complain. Hence a new counter was added to track the number of blocks used
by the free space btrees. This is an *on-disk format change*.

As a result of this, lazy superblock counters are a mkfs option and at the
moment on linux there is no way to convert an old filesystem. This is
possible - xfs_db can be used to twiddle the right bits and then
xfs_repair will do the format conversion for you. Similarly, you can
convert backwards as well. At some point we'll add functionality to
xfs_admin to do the bit twiddling easily....

SGI-PV: 964999
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28652a

Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2007-07-14 15:28:50 +10:00
Eric Sandeen 91d8723204 [XFS] Reduce endian flipping in alloc_btree, same as was done for
ialloc_btree.

SGI-PV: 955302
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26910a

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2006-09-28 11:05:40 +10:00
Nathan Scott 1121b219bf [XFS] use NULL for pointer initialisation instead of zero-cast-to-ptr
SGI-PV: 954580
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26562a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2006-09-28 10:58:40 +10:00
Christoph Hellwig c38e5e84db [XFS] remove left over INT_ comments in *alloc*.c We can verify endianess
handling with sparse now, no need for comments.

SGI-PV: 954580
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26557a

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2006-09-28 10:57:17 +10:00
Nathan Scott f6c2d1fa63 [XFS] Remove version 1 directory code. Never functioned on Linux, just
pure bloat.

SGI-PV: 952969
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26251a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2006-06-20 13:04:51 +10:00
Christoph Hellwig 16259e7d95 [XFS] Endianess annotations for various allocator data structures
SGI-PV: 943272
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:201006a

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 15:11:25 +11:00
Christoph Hellwig 5bde1ba99c [XFS] silence gcc4 warnings. the directory ones are wrong because of
information gcc could not find out (that a directory always has a ..
entry), the others are outright gcc bugs.

SGI-PV: 943511
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:200055a

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 15:06:18 +11:00
Nathan Scott 7b71876980 [XFS] Update license/copyright notices to match the prefered SGI
boilerplate.

SGI-PV: 913862
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23903a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 14:58:39 +11:00
Nathan Scott a844f4510d [XFS] Remove xfs_macros.c, xfs_macros.h, rework headers a whole lot.
SGI-PV: 943122
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 14:38:42 +11:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00