commit 8564c31587 upstream.
The ftrace-direct-too sample traces the handle_mm_fault function whose
signature changed since the introduction of the sample. Since:
commit bce617edec ("mm: do page fault accounting in handle_mm_fault")
handle_mm_fault now has 4 arguments. Therefore, the sample trampoline
should save 4 argument registers.
s390 saves all argument registers already so it does not need a change
but x86_64 needs an extra push and pop.
This also evolves the signature of the tracing function to make it
mirror the signature of the traced function.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230427140700.625241-2-revest@chromium.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: bce617edec ("mm: do page fault accounting in handle_mm_fault")
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b17c2baa30 ]
Replace all ret/retq instructions with ASM_RET in preparation of
making it more than a single instruction.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211204134907.964635458@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0daf5cb217 upstream.
There's another compilation fail (first here [1]) reported by kernel
test robot for W=1 clang build:
>> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c:7:6: warning: no previous
prototype for function 'my_direct_func1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void my_direct_func1(unsigned long ip)
Direct functions in ftrace direct sample modules need to have prototypes
defined. They are already global in order to be visible for the inline
assembly, so there's no problem.
The kernel test robot reported just error for ftrace-direct-multi-modify,
but I got same errors also for the rest of the modules touched by this patch.
[1] 67d4f6e3bf ftrace/samples: Add missing prototype for my_direct_func
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211219135317.212430-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: e1067a07cf ("ftrace/samples: Add module to test multi direct modify interface")
Fixes: ae0cc3b7e7 ("ftrace/samples: Add a sample module that implements modify_ftrace_direct()")
Fixes: 156473a0ff ("ftrace: Add another example of register_ftrace_direct() use case")
Fixes: b06457c83a ("ftrace: Add sample module that uses register_ftrace_direct()")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
my_tramp[12]? are declared as global functions in C, but they are not
marked global in the inline assembly definition. This mismatch confuses
Clang's Control-Flow Integrity checking. Fix the definitions by adding
.globl.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113183414.1446671-1-samitolvanen@google.com
Fixes: 9d907f1ae8 ("ftrace/samples: Add a sample module that implements modify_ftrace_direct()")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Add another module sample that registers a direct trampoline to a function
via register_ftrace_direct(). Having another module that does this allows to
test the use case of multiple direct callers registered, as more than one
direct caller goes into another path, and is needed to perform proper
testing of the register_ftrace_direct() call.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Florent Revest
Peter Zijlstra
Jiri Olsa
Sami Tolvanen
Josh Poimboeuf
Steven Rostedt (VMware)