Граф коммитов

24 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Thomas Gleixner 5a729246e5 treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_320.RULE
Based on the normalized pattern:

    this program is free software you can redistribute it and/or modify it
    under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
    published by the free software foundation  this program is distributed
    as is without any warranty of any kind whether express or implied
    without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a
    particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

    GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference.

Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-06-10 14:51:36 +02:00
Viresh Kumar 4d584efae0 cpufreq: scpi: Use .register_em() to register with energy model
Set the newly added .register_em() callback with
cpufreq_register_em_with_opp() to register with the EM core.

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-08-30 10:42:45 +05:30
Viresh Kumar 5ae4a4b45d cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag
During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all
the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around
as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example
cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got
registered properly.

The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the
CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no
one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably
because they just copied it from other drivers.

This was added earlier for some platforms [2] because their cpufreq
drivers were getting registered before the CPUs were registered with
subsys framework. And hence they used to fail.

The same isn't true anymore though. The current code flow in the kernel
is:

start_kernel()
-> kernel_init()
   -> kernel_init_freeable()
      -> do_basic_setup()
         -> driver_init()
            -> cpu_dev_init()
               -> subsys_system_register() //For CPUs

         -> do_initcalls()
            -> cpufreq_register_driver()

Clearly, the CPUs will always get registered with subsys framework
before any cpufreq driver can get probed. Remove the flag and update the
relevant drivers.

Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/include/linux/cpufreq.h?id=7cc9f0d9a1ab04cedc60d64fd8dcf7df224a3b4d # [1]
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c?id=f59d3bbe35f6268d729f51be82af8325d62f20f5 # [2]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-02-04 19:23:20 +01:00
Pali Rohár c0382d049d cpufreq: scpi: Add missing MODULE_ALIAS
This patch adds missing MODULE_ALIAS for automatic loading of this cpufreq
driver when it is compiled as an external module.

Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Fixes: 8def31034d ("cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-12-07 13:02:37 +05:30
Ionela Voinescu 1a0419b0db cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core
To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler
needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current
frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this scale can be computed
either by using counters (APERF/MPERF on x86, AMU on arm64), or by
piggy-backing on the frequency selection done by cpufreq.

For the latter, drivers have to explicitly set the scale factor
themselves, despite it being purely boiler-plate code: the required
information depends entirely on the kind of frequency switch callback
implemented by the driver, i.e. either of: target_index(), target(),
fast_switch() and setpolicy().

The fitness of those callbacks with regard to driving the Frequency
Invariance Engine (FIE) is studied below:

target_index()
==============
Documentation states that the chosen frequency "must be determined by
freq_table[index].frequency". It isn't clear if it *has* to be that
frequency, or if it can use that frequency value to do some computation
that ultimately leads to a different frequency selection. All drivers
go for the former, while the vexpress-spc-cpufreq has an atypical
implementation which is handled separately.

Therefore, the hook works on the assumption the core can use
freq_table[index].frequency.

target()
=======
This has been flagged as deprecated since:

  commit 9c0ebcf78f ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine")

It also doesn't have that many users:

  gx-suspmod.c:439:       .target = cpufreq_gx_target,
  s3c24xx-cpufreq.c:428:  .target = s3c_cpufreq_target,
  intel_pstate.c:2528:    .target = intel_cpufreq_target,
  cppc_cpufreq.c:401:     .target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target,
  cpufreq-nforce2.c:371:  .target = nforce2_target,
  sh-cpufreq.c:163:       .target = sh_cpufreq_target,
  pcc-cpufreq.c:573:      .target = pcc_cpufreq_target,

Similarly to the path taken for target_index() calls in the cpufreq core
during a frequency change, all of the drivers above will mark the end of a
frequency change by a call to cpufreq_freq_transition_end().

Therefore, cpufreq_freq_transition_end() can be used as the location for
the arch_set_freq_scale() call to potentially inform the scheduler of the
frequency change.

This change maintains the previous functionality for the drivers that
implement the target_index() callback, while also adding support for the
few drivers that implement the deprecated target() callback.

fast_switch()
=============
This callback *has* to return the frequency that was selected.

setpolicy()
===========
This callback does not have any designated way of informing what was the
end choice. But there are only two drivers using setpolicy(), and none
of them have current FIE support:

  drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c:281:	.setpolicy	= longrun_set_policy,
  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:2215:	.setpolicy	= intel_pstate_set_policy,

The intel_pstate is known to use counter-driven frequency invariance.

Conclusion
==========

Given that the significant majority of current FIE enabled drivers use
callbacks that lend themselves to triggering the setting of the FIE scale
factor in a generic way, move the invariance setter calls to cpufreq core.

As a result of setting the frequency scale factor in cpufreq core, after
callbacks that lend themselves to trigger it, remove this functionality
from the driver side.

To be noted that despite marking a successful frequency change, many
cpufreq drivers will consider the new frequency as the requested
frequency, although this is might not be the one granted by the hardware.

Therefore, the call to arch_set_freq_scale() is a "best effort" one, and
it is up to the architecture if the new frequency is used in the new
frequency scale factor setting (determined by the implementation of
arch_set_freq_scale()) or eventually used by the scheduler (determined
by the implementation of arch_scale_freq_capacity()). The architecture
is in a better position to decide if it has better methods to obtain
more accurate information regarding the current frequency and use that
information instead (for example, the use of counters).

Also, the implementation to arch_set_freq_scale() will now have to handle
error conditions (current frequency == 0) in order to prevent the
overhead in cpufreq core when the default arch_set_freq_scale()
implementation is used.

Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-09-18 19:10:42 +02:00
Lukasz Luba 0e0ffa855d OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers
The Energy Model framework supports not only CPU devices. Drop the CPU
specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a return
value, user might use it. This new interface provides easy way to create
a simple Energy Model, which then might be used by e.g. thermal subsystem.

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-06-24 17:16:42 +02:00
Sudeep Holla 1b82a4b5d3 cpufreq: scpi: remove stale/outdated comment about the driver
Commit 343a8d17fa ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
removed the arm_big_little dependency from scpi driver and doesn't
provide any ops to arm_big_little cpufreq driver. Lets remove that
stale comment.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-10-21 16:23:58 +05:30
Vincent Stehlé 31d4c528ce cpufreq: scpi: Fix use after free
Free the priv structure only after we are done using it.

Fixes: 1690d8bb91 ("cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
Cc: 4.20+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-03-28 11:14:31 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 1271d6d576 Merge branch 'pm-opp'
* pm-opp:
  cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
  opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
2019-03-04 11:19:14 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 78317ed93a Merge branch 'opp/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm into pm-opp
Pull operating performance points (OPP) framework updates for v5.1
from Viresh Kumar:

"This pull request contains following changes:

 - Introduced new OPP helper for power-estimation and used it in
   several cpufreq drivers (Quentin Perret, Matthias Kaehlcke, Dietmar
   Eggemann, and Yangtao Li).

 - OPP Debugfs cleanup (Greg KH).

 - OPP core cleanup (Viresh Kumar)."

* 'opp/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm:
  cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
  opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
  PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper
  PM / OPP: Remove unused parameter of _generic_set_opp_clk_only()
2019-02-12 12:14:33 +01:00
Quentin Perret 6915d7ad21 cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
Now that PM_OPP provides a helper function to estimate the power
consumed by CPUs, make sure to try and register an Energy Model (EM)
from scpi-cpufreq, hence ensuring interested subsystems (the task
scheduler, for example) can make use of that information when available.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-07 09:55:11 +05:30
Amit Kucheria cb772b8ce4 cpufreq: scpi: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
Use the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.

This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-30 23:06:08 +01:00
Viresh Kumar 1690d8bb91 cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs
Since the commit 2a4eb7358a "OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from
_dev_pm_opp_remove_table()", dynamically created OPP aren't
automatically removed anymore by dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(). This
affects the scpi and scmi cpufreq drivers which no longer free OPPs on
failures or on invocations of the policy->exit() callback.

Create a generic OPP helper dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic() which can be
called from these drivers instead of dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table().

In dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(), we need to make sure that the
opp_list isn't getting accessed simultaneously from other parts of the
OPP core while the helper is freeing dynamic OPPs, i.e. we can't drop
the opp_table->lock while traversing through the OPP list. And to
accomplish that, this patch also creates _opp_kref_release_unlocked()
which can be called from this new helper with the opp_table lock already
held.

Cc: 4.20 <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20
Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Fixes: 2a4eb7358a "OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table()"
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-04 12:19:40 +01:00
Viresh Kumar 472ada6021 cpufreq: scpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Dietmar Eggemann 9326fdf3fb cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
changed the cpufreq driver on juno from arm_big_little to scpi.

The scpi set_target function does not call the frequency-invariance
setter function arch_set_freq_scale() like the arm_big_little set_target
function does. As a result the task scheduler load and utilization
signals are not frequency-invariant on this platform anymore.

Fix this by adding a call to arch_set_freq_scale() into
scpi_cpufreq_set_target().

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-26 23:27:56 +01:00
Wei Yongjun 0725390da9 cpufreq: scpi: fix error return code in scpi_cpufreq_init()
Fix to return a negative error code from the clk_get() error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:15 +01:00
Sudeep Holla eb85c50c24 cpufreq: scpi: fix static checker warning cdev isn't an ERR_PTR
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c:203 scpi_cpufreq_ready()
	warn: 'cdev' isn't an ERR_PTR

of_cpufreq_cooling_register() returns NULL on error. This patch removes
the incorrect IS_ERR check on the returned pointer.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:51:41 +01:00
Sudeep Holla 343a8d17fa cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency
The dependency on physical_package_id from the topology to get the
cluster identifier is wrong. The concept of cluster used in ARM topology
is unfortunately not well defined in the architecture, we should avoid
using it. Further the frequency domain need not be mapped to so called
"clusters" one to one.

SCPI already provides means to obtain the frequency domain id from the
device tree. In order to support some new topologies(e.g. DSU which
contains 2 frequency domains within the physical cluster), pseudo
clusters are created to make this driver work which is wrong again.

In order to solve those issues and also remove dependency of topological
physical id for frequency domain, this patch removes the arm_big_little
dependency from scpi driver.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-01-17 12:59:33 +01:00
Bhumika Goyal 0011c6da99 cpufreq: arm_big_little: make cpufreq_arm_bL_ops structures const
Make these const as they are only getting passed to the functions
bL_cpufreq_{register/unregister} having the arguments as const.

Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-11-08 23:22:20 +01:00
Sudeep Holla c0f2e21953 cpufreq: scpi: use new scpi_ops functions to remove duplicate code
scpi_ops now provide APIs to get the transition_latency and to add
OPPs to the devices making those logic redundant here.

This patch makes use of those APIs and removes the redundant code in
this driver.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2017-06-05 11:14:35 +01:00
Markus Elfring b0d8a69d08 cpufreq-SCPI: Delete unnecessary assignment for the field "owner"
The field "owner" is set by the core.
Thus delete an unneeded initialisation.

Generated by scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-08-18 03:42:32 +02:00
Sudeep Holla d9975b0b07 cpufreq: arm_big_little: use generic OPP functions for {init, free}_opp_table
Currently when performing random CPU hot-plugs and suspend-to-ram(S2R)
on systems using arm_big_little cpufreq driver, we get warnings similar
to something like below:

cpu cpu1: _opp_add: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: 600000000,
	volt: 800000, enabled: 1. New: freq: 600000000, volt: 800000, enabled: 1

This is mainly because the OPPs for the shared cpus are not set. We can
just use dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table in case the OPPs are obtained
from DT(arm_big_little_dt.c) or use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus if the
OPPs are obtained by other means like firmware(e.g. scpi-cpufreq.c)

Also now that the generic dev_pm_opp{,_of}_cpumask_remove_table can
handle removal of opp table and entries for all associated CPUs, we can
re-use dev_pm_opp{,_of}_cpumask_remove_table as free_opp_table in
cpufreq_arm_bL_ops.

This patch makes necessary changes to reuse the generic OPP functions for
{init,free}_opp_table and thereby eliminating the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 01:40:04 +02:00
Dan Carpenter a7def561c2 cpufreq: scpi-cpufreq: signedness bug in scpi_get_dvfs_info()
The "domain" variable needs to be signed for the error handling to work.

Fixes: 8def31034d (cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver)
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-12-24 02:11:37 +01:00
Sudeep Holla 8def31034d cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver
On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control
Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system
control including CPU DVFS. SCPI Message Protocol is used to
communicate with the SCPI.

This patch adds a interface driver for adding OPPs and registering
the arm_big_little cpufreq driver for such systems.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
2015-09-28 11:53:38 +01:00