Граф коммитов

7 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Tejun Heo 5a0e3ad6af include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
Dmitry Torokhov c7a1f3ccfc Input: elantech - do not advertise relative events
Elantech touchpads work in absolute mode and do not generate relative
events so they should not be advertising them.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2009-11-20 00:52:11 -08:00
Dmitry Torokhov b7802c5c1e Input: psmouse - use boolean type
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2009-09-10 22:11:38 -07:00
Arjan Opmeer b2546df69b Input: elantech - make sure touchpad is really in absolute mode
There exist laptops with Elantech touchpads where switching to absolute mode
does not happen, although writing the configuration register succeeds
without error. Reading back the register afterwards reveils that the
absolute mode bit is not set as if masked out by the touchpad firmware.

Always read back register 0x10, make sure that for hardware version 1 the
absolute mode bit is actually set and fail otherwise. This prevents the case
where the touchpad is claimed by the Elantech driver but is nonetheless not
working.

Signed-off-by: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2009-04-18 19:11:59 -07:00
Arjan Opmeer 3f8c0df43d Input: elantech - provide a workaround for jumpy cursor on firmware 2.34
It seems that Elantech touchpad firmware version 2.34 on the Hercules eCAFÉ
suffers from a problem where bogus coordinates get reported at the beginning
of a touch action. This causes the mouse cursor or the scrolled page to
jump.

Included patch provides a workaround that discards mouse packets that are
likely to contain bogus coordinates. The workaround is activated when we
detect touchpad with fimware version 2.34.

Signed-off-by: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2009-04-18 19:11:51 -07:00
Arjan Opmeer 9ab7b25e6a Input: elantech - touchpad driver miss-recognising logitech mice
Some Logitech mice react to the magic knock like Elantech touchpad would.
This leads to those mice being misdetected as Elantech touchpads.  Add a
version query to elantech_detect() to distinguish the two.

[dtor@mail.ru:
 - lower severity of some messages - when we are not sure yet if
   device is Elantech or not not responding to knock is not an error.
]

Signed-off-by: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2009-02-28 14:01:39 -08:00
Arjan Opmeer 2a0bd75e5e Input: psmouse - add support for Elantech touchpads
This is version 5 of the driver. Relative mode support has been
dropped (users wishing to use touchpad in relative mode can use
standard PS/2 protocol emulation done in hardware). The driver
supports both original version of Elantech protocol and the newer
one used by touchpads installed in EeePC.

Signed-off-by: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
2008-10-16 22:54:35 -04:00