Граф коммитов

163 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Theodore Ts'o 54dd0e0a1b ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()
Add explicit checks in ext4_xattr_block_get() just in case the
e_value_offs and e_value_size fields in the the xattr block are
corrupted in memory after the buffer_verified bit is set on the xattr
block.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
2018-03-30 20:04:11 -04:00
Theodore Ts'o 9496005d6c ext4: add bounds checking to ext4_xattr_find_entry()
Add some paranoia checks to make sure we don't stray beyond the end of
the valid memory region containing ext4 xattr entries while we are
scanning for a match.

Also rename the function to xattr_find_entry() since it is static and
thus only used in fs/ext4/xattr.c

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
2018-03-30 20:00:56 -04:00
Theodore Ts'o de05ca8526 ext4: move call to ext4_error() into ext4_xattr_check_block()
Refactor the call to EXT4_ERROR_INODE() into ext4_xattr_check_block().
This simplifies the code, and fixes a problem where not all callers of
ext4_xattr_check_block() were not resulting in ext4_error() getting
called when the xattr block is corrupted.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2018-03-30 15:42:25 -04:00
Eric Biggers ce3fd194fc ext4: limit xattr size to INT_MAX
ext4 isn't validating the sizes of xattrs where the value of the xattr
is stored in an external inode.  This is problematic because
->e_value_size is a u32, but ext4_xattr_get() returns an int.  A very
large size is misinterpreted as an error code, which ext4_get_acl()
translates into a bogus ERR_PTR() for which IS_ERR() returns false,
causing a crash.

Fix this by validating that all xattrs are <= INT_MAX bytes.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1095.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199185
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560793

Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e50e5129f3 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support")
2018-03-29 14:31:42 -04:00
Jeff Layton ee73f9a52a ext4: convert to new i_version API
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-29 06:42:21 -05:00
Greg Kroah-Hartman b24413180f License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
 - file had no licensing information it it.
 - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
 - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
 - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
 - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
   lines of source
 - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
   lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

 - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
   considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
   COPYING file license applied.

   For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0                                              11139

   and resulted in the first patch in this series.

   If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
   Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930

   and resulted in the second patch in this series.

 - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
   of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
   any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
   it (per prior point).  Results summary:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
   GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
   LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
   GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
   ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
   LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
   LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1

   and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

 - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
   the concluded license(s).

 - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
   license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
   licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

 - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
   resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
   which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

 - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
   confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

 - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
   the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
   in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
 - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
   license ids and scores
 - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
   files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
 - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
   was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
   SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-02 11:10:55 +01:00
Tahsin Erdogan a6d0567604 ext4: backward compatibility support for Lustre ea_inode implementation
Original Lustre ea_inode feature did not have ref counts on xattr inodes
because there was always one parent that referenced it. New
implementation expects ref count to be initialized which is not true for
Lustre case. Handle this by detecting Lustre created xattr inode and set
its ref count to 1.

The quota handling of xattr inodes have also changed with deduplication
support. New implementation manually manages quotas to support sharing
across multiple users. A consequence is that, a referencing inode
incorporates the blocks of xattr inode into its own i_block field.

We need to know how a xattr inode was created so that we can reverse the
block charges during reference removal. This is handled by introducing a
EXT4_STATE_LUSTRE_EA_INODE flag. The flag is set on a xattr inode if
inode appears to have been created by Lustre. During xattr inode reference
removal, the manual quota uncharge is skipped if the flag is set.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-08-24 14:25:02 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 32aaf19420 ext4: add missing xattr hash update
When updating an extended attribute, if the padded value sizes are the
same, a shortcut is taken to avoid the bulk of the work. This was fine
until the xattr hash update was moved inside ext4_xattr_set_entry().
With that change, the hash update got missed in the shortcut case.

Thanks to ZhangYi (yizhang089@gmail.com) for root causing the problem.

Fixes: daf8328172 ("ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes")

Reported-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-08-14 08:30:06 -04:00
Miao Xie b640b2c51b ext4: cleanup ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea()
Clean up some goto statement, make ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() clearer.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
2017-08-06 00:55:48 -04:00
Miao Xie cf0a5e818f ext4: restructure ext4_expand_extra_isize
Current ext4_expand_extra_isize just tries to expand extra isize, if
someone is holding xattr lock or some check fails, it will give up.
So rename its name to ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize.

Besides that, we clean up unnecessary check and move some relative checks
into it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
2017-08-06 00:40:01 -04:00
Miao Xie 3b10fdc6d8 ext4: fix forgetten xattr lock protection in ext4_expand_extra_isize
We should avoid the contention between the i_extra_isize update and
the inline data insertion, so move the xattr trylock in front of
i_extra_isize update.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
2017-08-06 00:27:38 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 9699d4f91d ext4: make xattr inode reads faster
ext4_xattr_inode_read() currently reads each block sequentially while
waiting for io operation to complete before moving on to the next
block. This prevents request merging in block layer.

Add a ext4_bread_batch() function that starts reads for all blocks
then optionally waits for them to complete. A similar logic is used
in ext4_find_entry(), so update that code to use the new function.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-08-06 00:07:01 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan ec00022030 ext4: inplace xattr block update fails to deduplicate blocks
When an xattr block has a single reference, block is updated inplace
and it is reinserted to the cache. Later, a cache lookup is performed
to see whether an existing block has the same contents. This cache
lookup will most of the time return the just inserted entry so
deduplication is not achieved.

Running the following test script will produce two xattr blocks which
can be observed in "File ACL: " line of debugfs output:

  mke2fs -b 1024 -I 128 -F -O extent /dev/sdb 1G
  mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb

  touch /mnt/sdb/{x,y}

  setfattr -n user.1 -v aaa /mnt/sdb/x
  setfattr -n user.2 -v bbb /mnt/sdb/x

  setfattr -n user.1 -v aaa /mnt/sdb/y
  setfattr -n user.2 -v bbb /mnt/sdb/y

  debugfs -R 'stat x' /dev/sdb | cat
  debugfs -R 'stat y' /dev/sdb | cat

This patch defers the reinsertion to the cache so that we can locate
other blocks with the same contents.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
2017-08-05 22:41:42 -04:00
Emoly Liu 191eac3300 ext4: error should be cleared if ea_inode isn't added to the cache
For Lustre, if ea_inode fails in hash validation but passes parent
inode and generation checks, it won't be added to the cache as well
as the error "-EFSCORRUPTED" should be cleared, otherwise it will
cause "Structure needs cleaning" when running getfattr command.

Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-9723

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: dec214d00e
Signed-off-by: Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: tahsin@google.com
2017-07-31 00:40:22 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan af65207c76 ext4: fix __ext4_new_inode() journal credits calculation
ea_inode feature allows creating extended attributes that are up to
64k in size. Update __ext4_new_inode() to pick increased credit limits.

To avoid overallocating too many journal credits, update
__ext4_xattr_set_credits() to make a distinction between xattr create
vs update. This helps __ext4_new_inode() because all attributes are
known to be new, so we can save credits that are normally needed to
delete old values.

Also, have fscrypt specify its maximum context size so that we don't
end up allocating credits for 64k size.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-07-06 00:01:59 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan cdb7ee4c63 ext4: add nombcache mount option
The main purpose of mb cache is to achieve deduplication in
extended attributes. In use cases where opportunity for deduplication
is unlikely, it only adds overhead.

Add a mount option to explicitly turn off mb cache.

Suggested-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:55:14 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan b9fc761ea2 ext4: strong binding of xattr inode references
To verify that a xattr entry is not pointing to the wrong xattr inode,
we currently check that the target inode has EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag set and
also the entry size matches the target inode size.

For stronger validation, also incorporate crc32c hash of the value into
the e_hash field. This is done regardless of whether the entry lives in
the inode body or external attribute block.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:53:15 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan daf8328172 ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes
When an extended attribute block is modified, ext4_xattr_hash_entry()
recalculates e_hash for the entry that is pointed by s->here. This  is
unnecessary if the modification is to remove an entry.

Currently, if the removed entry is the last one and there are other
entries remaining, hash calculation targets the just erased entry which
has been filled with zeroes and effectively does nothing.  If the removed
entry is not the last one and there are more entries, this time it will
recalculate hash on the next entry which is totally unnecessary.

Fix these by moving the decision on when to recalculate hash to
ext4_xattr_set_entry().

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:52:03 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 9c6e7853c5 ext4: reserve space for xattr entries/names
New ea_inode feature allows putting large xattr values into external
inodes.  struct ext4_xattr_entry and the attribute name however have to
remain in the inode extra space or external attribute block.  Once that
space is exhausted, no further entries can be added.  Some of that space
could also be used by values that fit in there at the time of addition.

So, a single xattr entry whose value barely fits in the external block
could prevent further entries being added.

To mitigate the problem, this patch introduces a notion of reserved
space in the external attribute block that cannot be used by value data.
This reserve is enforced when ea_inode feature is enabled.  The amount
of reserve is arbitrarily chosen to be min(block_size/8, 1024).  The
table below shows how much space is reserved for each block size and the
guaranteed mininum number of entries that can be placed in the external
attribute block.

block size     reserved bytes  entries (name length = 16)
 1k            128              3
 2k            256              7
 4k            512             15
 8k            1024            31
16k            1024            31
32k            1024            31
64k            1024            31

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:48:53 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 7a9ca53aea quota: add get_inode_usage callback to transfer multi-inode charges
Ext4 ea_inode feature allows storing xattr values in external inodes to
be able to store values that are bigger than a block in size. Ext4 also
has deduplication support for these type of inodes. With deduplication,
the actual storage waste is eliminated but the users of such inodes are
still charged full quota for the inodes as if there was no sharing
happening in the background.

This design requires ext4 to manually charge the users because the
inodes are shared.

An implication of this is that, if someone calls chown on a file that
has such references we need to transfer the quota for the file and xattr
inodes. Current dquot_transfer() function implicitly transfers one inode
charge. With ea_inode feature, we would like to transfer multiple inode
charges.

Add get_inode_usage callback which can interrogate the total number of
inodes that were charged for a given inode.

[ Applied fix from Colin King to make sure the 'ret' variable is
  initialized on the successful return path.  Detected by
  CoverityScan, CID#1446616 ("Uninitialized scalar variable") --tytso]

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-06-22 11:46:48 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan dec214d00e ext4: xattr inode deduplication
Ext4 now supports xattr values that are up to 64k in size (vfs limit).
Large xattr values are stored in external inodes each one holding a
single value. Once written the data blocks of these inodes are immutable.

The real world use cases are expected to have a lot of value duplication
such as inherited acls etc. To reduce data duplication on disk, this patch
implements a deduplicator that allows sharing of xattr inodes.

The deduplication is based on an in-memory hash lookup that is a best
effort sharing scheme. When a xattr inode is read from disk (i.e.
getxattr() call), its crc32c hash is added to a hash table. Before
creating a new xattr inode for a value being set, the hash table is
checked to see if an existing inode holds an identical value. If such an
inode is found, the ref count on that inode is incremented. On value
removal the ref count is decremented and if it reaches zero the inode is
deleted.

The quota charging for such inodes is manually managed. Every reference
holder is charged the full size as if there was no sharing happening.
This is consistent with how xattr blocks are also charged.

[ Fixed up journal credits calculation to handle inline data and the
  rare case where an shared xattr block can get freed when two thread
  race on breaking the xattr block sharing. --tytso ]

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:44:55 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 30a7eb970c ext4: cleanup transaction restarts during inode deletion
During inode deletion, the number of journal credits that will be
needed is hard to determine.  For that reason we have journal
extend/restart calls in several places.  Whenever a transaction is
restarted, filesystem must be in a consistent state because there is
no atomicity guarantee beyond a restart call.

Add ext4_xattr_ensure_credits() helper function which takes care of
journal extend/restart logic.  It also handles getting jbd2 write
access and dirty metadata calls.  This function is called at every
iteration of handling an ea_inode reference.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:42:09 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 47387409ee ext2, ext4: make mb block cache names more explicit
There will be a second mb_cache instance that tracks ea_inodes. Make
existing names more explicit so that it is clear that they refer to
xattr block cache.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 11:28:55 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan c07dfcb458 mbcache: make mbcache naming more generic
Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_cache_entry.e_block
field could be holding either a block number or an inode number.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 10:29:53 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 0421a189bc ext4: modify ext4_xattr_ino_array to hold struct inode *
Tracking struct inode * rather than the inode number eliminates the
repeated ext4_xattr_inode_iget() call later. The second call cannot
fail in practice but still requires explanation when it wants to ignore
the return value. Avoid the trouble and make things simple.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22 10:26:31 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan c1a5d5f6ab ext4: improve journal credit handling in set xattr paths
Both ext4_set_acl() and ext4_set_context() need to be made aware of
ea_inode feature when it comes to credits calculation.

Also add a sufficient credits check in ext4_xattr_set_handle() right
after xattr write lock is grabbed. Original credits calculation is done
outside the lock so there is a possiblity that the initially calculated
credits are not sufficient anymore.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:28:40 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 65d3000520 ext4: ext4_xattr_delete_inode() should return accurate errors
In a few places the function returns without trying to pass the actual
error code to the caller. Fix those.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:24:38 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan b347e2bcd1 ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block too
When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it
doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to
store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline
area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block.

This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the
sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:20:32 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan b315529891 ext4: fix credits calculation for xattr inode
When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored
in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than
EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits
calculation is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:16:20 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 7cec191894 ext4: fix ext4_xattr_cmp()
When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not
available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using
value offset.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:14:30 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan f6109100ba ext4: fix ext4_xattr_move_to_block()
When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries
that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because
value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be
read from its external inode.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:11:54 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 9bb21cedda ext4: fix ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() value size calculation
ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline
space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode
the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in
the inline area. Change the function to take this into account.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:05:44 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 0bd454c04f ext4: ext4_xattr_value_same() should return false for external data
ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new
xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is
stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to
just assume that they are not equal.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 22:02:06 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 990461dd85 ext4: add missing le32_to_cpu(e_value_inum) conversions
Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using
le32_to_cpu().

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:59:30 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 9096669332 ext4: clean up ext4_xattr_inode_get()
The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful
return from ext4_xattr_inode_get().  On error return, the callers ignore
the output value so there is no need to update it.

Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread().  If the actual xattr inode
size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may
return NULL which would indicate data corruption.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:57:36 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan bab79b0499 ext4: change ext4_xattr_inode_iget() signature
In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return
values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves
the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:49:53 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 1e7d359d71 ext4: fix ref counting for ea_inode
The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether
the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list
addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r
we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below.

"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day..."

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:39:38 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 9e1ba00161 ext4: ea_inode owner should be the same as the inode owner
Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the
xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the
parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for
xattr block and regular data block writes.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:27:00 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan bd3b963b27 ext4: attach jinode after creation of xattr inode
In data=ordered mode jinode needs to be attached to the xattr inode when
writing data to it. Attachment normally occurs during file open for regular
files. Since we are not using file interface to write to the xattr inode,
the jinode attach needs to be done manually.

Otherwise the following crash occurs in data=ordered mode.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
 IP: jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 PGD 13b3c0067
 P4D 13b3c0067
 PUD 137660067
 PMD 0

 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 3 PID: 1877 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #749
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff88010e368980 task.stack: ffffc90000374000
 RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377980 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880123b06230 RCX: 0000000000280000
 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88012c8585d0
 RBP: ffffc900003779b0 R08: 0000000000000202 R09: 0000000000000001
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000400 R12: ffff8801111f81c0
 R13: ffff88013b2b6800 R14: ffffc90000377ab0 R15: 0000000000000001
 FS:  00007f0c99b77740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000136d91000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  jbd2_journal_inode_add_write+0xe/0x10
  ext4_map_blocks+0x59e/0x620
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x501/0x7d0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:24:31 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 1b917ed8ae ext4: do not set posix acls on xattr inodes
We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.

Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
  ---------------------------------------------
  python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  3 locks held by python/1894:
   #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
   #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
   #2:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x67/0x99
   __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
   lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
   down_read+0x2f/0x60
   ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
   ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
   get_acl+0x72/0xf0
   posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
   ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
   __ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
   ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
   ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
   ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
   ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
   ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
   __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
   __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
   vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
   setxattr+0x129/0x160
   path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
   SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:21:39 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 0de5983d35 ext4: lock inode before calling ext4_orphan_add()
ext4_orphan_add() requires caller to be holding the inode lock.
Add missing lock statements.

 WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1806 at fs/ext4/namei.c:2731 ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 CPU: 3 PID: 1806 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #746
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff880135d466c0 task.stack: ffffc900014b0000
 RIP: 0010:ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 RSP: 0018:ffffc900014b3d50 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801348fe1f0 RCX: ffffc900014b3c64
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801348fe1f0 RDI: ffff8801348fe1f0
 RBP: ffffc900014b3da0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff80e82025
 R10: 0000000000004692 R11: 000000000000468d R12: ffff880137598000
 R13: ffff880137217000 R14: ffff880134ac58d0 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  00007fc50f09e740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00000000008bc2e0 CR3: 00000001375ac000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add.constprop.19+0x9d/0xf0
  ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x1c4/0x2f0
  ext4_evict_inode+0x15a/0x7f0
  evict+0xc0/0x1a0
  iput+0x16a/0x270
  do_unlinkat+0x172/0x290
  SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:19:16 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan 33d201e027 ext4: fix lockdep warning about recursive inode locking
Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents
to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode
along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because
xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is
restricted.

Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock.

 ============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 python/1822 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 4 locks held by python/1822:
  #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
  #2:  (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420
  #3:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
  __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750
  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
  down_write+0x2c/0x60
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21 21:17:10 -04:00
Andreas Dilger e50e5129f3 ext4: xattr-in-inode support
Large xattr support is implemented for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE.

If the size of an xattr value is larger than will fit in a single
external block, then the xattr value will be saved into the body
of an external xattr inode.

The also helps support a larger number of xattr, since only the headers
will be stored in the in-inode space or the single external block.

The inode is referenced from the xattr header via "e_value_inum",
which was formerly "e_value_block", but that field was never used.
The e_value_size still contains the xattr size so that listing
xattrs does not need to look up the inode if the data is not accessed.

struct ext4_xattr_entry {
        __u8    e_name_len;     /* length of name */
        __u8    e_name_index;   /* attribute name index */
        __le16  e_value_offs;   /* offset in disk block of value */
        __le32  e_value_inum;   /* inode in which value is stored */
        __le32  e_value_size;   /* size of attribute value */
        __le32  e_hash;         /* hash value of name and value */
        char    e_name[0];      /* attribute name */
};

The xattr inode is marked with the EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag and also
holds a back-reference to the owning inode in its i_mtime field,
allowing the ext4/e2fsck to verify the correct inode is accessed.

[ Applied fix by Dan Carpenter to avoid freeing an ERR_PTR. ]

Lustre-Jira: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-80
Lustre-bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
2017-06-21 21:10:32 -04:00
Tahsin Erdogan b8cb5a545c ext4: fix quota charging for shared xattr blocks
ext4_xattr_block_set() calls dquot_alloc_block() to charge for an xattr
block when new references are made. However if dquot_initialize() hasn't
been called on an inode, request for charging is effectively ignored
because ext4_inode_info->i_dquot is not initialized yet.

Add dquot_initialize() to call paths that lead to ext4_xattr_block_set().

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-05-24 18:24:07 -04:00
Eric Biggers 6ba644b9fd ext4: remove ext4_xattr_check_entry()
ext4_xattr_check_entry() was redundant with validation of the full xattr
entries list in ext4_xattr_check_entries(), which all callers also did.
ext4_xattr_check_entry() also didn't actually do correct validation;
specifically, it never checked that the value doesn't overlap the xattr
names, nor did it account for padding when checking whether the xattr
value overflows the available space.  So remove it to eliminate any
potential confusion.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-04-30 00:01:02 -04:00
Eric Biggers 2c4f992337 ext4: rename ext4_xattr_check_names() to ext4_xattr_check_entries()
ext4_xattr_check_names() actually validates both the xattr names and
values, not just the names.  So rename it to ext4_xattr_check_entries()
to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-04-29 23:56:52 -04:00
Eric Biggers ba7ea1d8f4 ext4: merge ext4_xattr_list() into ext4_listxattr()
There's no difference between ext4_xattr_list() and ext4_listxattr(), so
merge them together and just have ext4_listxattr().  Some years ago they
took different arguments, but that's no longer the case.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-04-29 23:53:17 -04:00
Eric Biggers d600618673 ext4: constify static data that is never modified
Constify static data in ext4 that is never (intentionally) modified so
that it is placed in .rodata and benefits from memory protection.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-04-29 23:47:50 -04:00
Theodore Ts'o dac7a4b4b1 ext4: lock the xattr block before checksuming it
We must lock the xattr block before calculating or verifying the
checksum in order to avoid spurious checksum failures.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193661

Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2017-03-25 17:22:47 -04:00
Theodore Ts'o 0db1ff222d ext4: add shutdown bit and check for it
Add a shutdown bit that will cause ext4 processing to fail immediately
with EIO.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-02-05 01:28:48 -05:00