Johan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500:
test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500
Modules linked in: test_bpf(+)
CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1
NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18
REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty)
MSR: 0000000080089000 <EE,ME> CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0
<...>
NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c
LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf]
Call Trace:
.__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable)
.test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf]
.do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c
.do_init_module+0x68/0x28c
.load_module+0x2460/0x2abc
.__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c
.system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8
system_call_common+0xf0/0x210
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc
<...>
---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]---
Illegal instruction
The illegal instruction turned out to be 'ldbrx' emitted for
BPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of
the same and implement an alternative approach for older processors.
Fixes: 156d0e290e ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Reported-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1e51c6fdf572062cf3009a751c3406bda01b832.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Pad instructions emitted for BPF_CALL so that the number of instructions
generated does not change for different function addresses. This is
especially important for calls to other bpf functions, whose address
will only be known during extra pass.
Fixes: 51c66ad849 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/52d8fe51f7620a6f27f377791564d79d75463576.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
- Optimise radix KVM guest entry/exit by 2x on Power9/Power10.
- Allow firmware to tell us whether to disable the entry and uaccess flushes on Power10
or later CPUs.
- Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for 32 and 64-bit BPF jits.
- Several fixes and improvements to our hard lockup watchdog.
- Activate HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on 32-bit.
- Allow building the 64-bit Book3S kernel without hash MMU support, ie. Radix only.
- Add KUAP (SMAP) support for 40x, 44x, 8xx, Book3E (64-bit).
- Add new encodings for perf_mem_data_src.mem_hops field, and use them on Power10.
- A series of small performance improvements to 64-bit interrupt entry.
- Several commits fixing issues when building with the clang integrated assembler.
- Many other small features and fixes.
Thanks to: Alan Modra, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Ammar Faizi, Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann,
Athira Rajeev, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe JAILLET, Christophe Leroy, Christoph Hellwig,
Daniel Axtens, David Yang, Erhard Furtner, Fabiano Rosas, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Guo Ren,
Hari Bathini, Jason Wang, Joel Stanley, Julia Lawall, Kajol Jain, Kees Cook, Laurent
Dufour, Madhavan Srinivasan, Mark Brown, Minghao Chi, Nageswara R Sastry, Naresh Kamboju,
Nathan Chancellor, Nathan Lynch, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Child, Oliver O'Halloran, Peiwei
Hu, Randy Dunlap, Ravi Bangoria, Rob Herring, Russell Currey, Sachin Sant, Sean
Christopherson, Segher Boessenkool, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, Tyrel Datwyler, Xiang
wangx, Yang Guang.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJHBAABCAAxFiEEJFGtCPCthwEv2Y/bUevqPMjhpYAFAmHhVFMTHG1wZUBlbGxl
cm1hbi5pZC5hdQAKCRBR6+o8yOGlgKwzD/9UUEZzWyzMVRJvP9FPZByN2M8czxHJ
tuqEuVqnfks8ad8tfm2ebng5t8ZuVASBQU2fpPA1+lpdvprgZN5RFGMRh729vskn
2aHQPmFvFObNbXOgCoXzk+C5xYi3zoRMVM968neSPBneYo+xDicn/zN5CHAgsjhX
+baemJQ7/xzwLiZgTHe8fWw3nTk3IbPBpha59SdTvR8Moy6I4O8CDPIYEm3U3/J3
x14ZRETqjksL7YOzEBk0avm1dDZRw/johz29oRYSmCj7dyy5OqrkPwokJiRY90eA
1lVdofDc0zElaSWkVGzKdSWRUIXjKIVdtejvDeEvl6H/mI6q4TVZE8rFmn+3Rvgf
9q0iKtmw5Kn11cqgY/pgEGmxnQtIdAodNfI/t939E7+O5LbcznuYUiy0J/kTD/vl
Xduotg2dsCI+5ukf1wrk2wt9LhqZL+ziOeaBhyDM4orV8T3HBYL6zWBptun//IGO
lK6TvvCHSYnGqY4bnrAmiOnbbEtnP6nN3zbcXgSvPM0wCRHPIEqd0NRXtfISo32d
vBPq1neXWo4wrRJj9X3yOuP+5fEA4I+hB3yrCJOkcEcz+8NhlboQXU7raVsJL+bd
kze75H8hwX7kE71oJFFl13LbSNABgiLFARTBXKfvdQA2iLdR0Snvm+OouvwWRPo/
Po7Nm3zqdLc/1A==
=BxhQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'powerpc-5.17-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux
Pull powerpc updates from Michael Ellerman:
- Optimise radix KVM guest entry/exit by 2x on Power9/Power10.
- Allow firmware to tell us whether to disable the entry and uaccess
flushes on Power10 or later CPUs.
- Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for 32 and 64-bit BPF jits.
- Several fixes and improvements to our hard lockup watchdog.
- Activate HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on 32-bit.
- Allow building the 64-bit Book3S kernel without hash MMU support, ie.
Radix only.
- Add KUAP (SMAP) support for 40x, 44x, 8xx, Book3E (64-bit).
- Add new encodings for perf_mem_data_src.mem_hops field, and use them
on Power10.
- A series of small performance improvements to 64-bit interrupt entry.
- Several commits fixing issues when building with the clang integrated
assembler.
- Many other small features and fixes.
Thanks to Alan Modra, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Ammar Faizi, Anders Roxell,
Arnd Bergmann, Athira Rajeev, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe JAILLET,
Christophe Leroy, Christoph Hellwig, Daniel Axtens, David Yang, Erhard
Furtner, Fabiano Rosas, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Guo Ren, Hari Bathini, Jason
Wang, Joel Stanley, Julia Lawall, Kajol Jain, Kees Cook, Laurent Dufour,
Madhavan Srinivasan, Mark Brown, Minghao Chi, Nageswara R Sastry, Naresh
Kamboju, Nathan Chancellor, Nathan Lynch, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Child,
Oliver O'Halloran, Peiwei Hu, Randy Dunlap, Ravi Bangoria, Rob Herring,
Russell Currey, Sachin Sant, Sean Christopherson, Segher Boessenkool,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, Tyrel Datwyler, Xiang wangx, and Yang
Guang.
* tag 'powerpc-5.17-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: (240 commits)
powerpc/xmon: Dump XIVE information for online-only processors.
powerpc/opal: use default_groups in kobj_type
powerpc/cacheinfo: use default_groups in kobj_type
powerpc/sched: Remove unused TASK_SIZE_OF
powerpc/xive: Add missing null check after calling kmalloc
powerpc/floppy: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
selftests/powerpc: Add a test of sigreturning to an unaligned address
powerpc/64s: Use EMIT_WARN_ENTRY for SRR debug warnings
powerpc/64s: Mask NIP before checking against SRR0
powerpc/perf: Fix spelling of "its"
powerpc/32: Fix boot failure with GCC latent entropy plugin
powerpc/code-patching: Replace patch_instruction() by ppc_inst_write() in selftests
powerpc/code-patching: Move code patching selftests in its own file
powerpc/code-patching: Move instr_is_branch_{i/b}form() in code-patching.h
powerpc/code-patching: Move patch_exception() outside code-patching.c
powerpc/code-patching: Use test_trampoline for prefixed patch test
powerpc/code-patching: Fix patch_branch() return on out-of-range failure
powerpc/code-patching: Reorganise do_patch_instruction() to ease error handling
powerpc/code-patching: Fix unmap_patch_area() error handling
powerpc/code-patching: Fix error handling in do_patch_instruction()
...
With KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to access userspace
needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP. But that is not
happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction. Though PPC32 does not
support read protection, considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID
(which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer
or NULL but should never be a pointer to userspace address, execute
BPF_PROBE_MEM load only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set
dst_reg=0 and move on.
This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad
kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table.
[Alexei suggested for x86]
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-9-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.
Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains 3 instructions,
first 2 instructions clear dest_reg (lower & higher 32-bit registers)
and last instruction jumps to next instruction in the BPF code.
extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and
'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example
layout of BPF program with extable present:
+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| lwz r28,4(r4) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r24) |
| lwz r4,4(r24) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4278 -->| li r28,0 | \
| li r27,0 | | fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4284 -->| li r4,0 |
| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b4 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffe4 | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffe8 |
+------------------+
(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-8-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
On PPC64 with KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to
access userspace needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP.
But that is not happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction.
So, when BPF program tries to access invalid userspace address,
page-fault handler considers it as bad KUAP fault:
Kernel attempted to read user page (d0000000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
Considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID (which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM
mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer or NULL but should
never be a pointer to userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM load
only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on.
This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad
kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table.
[Alexei suggested for x86]
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-7-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.
Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains two instructions,
first instruction clears dest_reg and 2nd jumps to next instruction
in the BPF code. extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of
the instruction and 'fixup' field contains relative offset of the
fixup entry. Example layout of BPF program with extable present:
+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| ld r27,4(r3) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r4) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4280 -->| li r27,0 | \ fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4288 -->| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b0 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffec | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffec |
+------------------+
(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Define and use PPC_RAW_BRANCH() macro instead of open coding it. This
macro is used while adding BPF_PROBE_MEM support.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
In case of extra_pass, usual JIT passes are always skipped. So,
extra_pass is always false while calling bpf_jit_build_body() and
can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
SEEN_STACK is unused on PowerPC. Remove it. Also, have
SEEN_TAILCALL use 0x40000000.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36 ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.
After commit 874be05f52 ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
- Enable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for Freescale 85xx platforms.
- Activate CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX by default, while still allowing it to be disabled.
- Add support for out-of-line static calls on 32-bit.
- Fix oopses doing bpf-to-bpf calls when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is enabled.
- Fix boot hangs on e5500 due to stale value in ESR passed to do_page_fault().
- Fix several bugs on pseries in handling of device tree cache information for hotplugged
CPUs, and/or during partition migration.
- Various other small features and fixes.
Thanks to: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Alistair Popple, Anatolij Gustschin, Andrew Donnellan,
Athira Rajeev, Bixuan Cui, Bjorn Helgaas, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe Leroy, Daniel
Axtens, Daniel Henrique Barboza, Denis Kirjanov, Fabiano Rosas, Frederic Barrat, Gustavo
A. R. Silva, Hari Bathini, Jacques de Laval, Joel Stanley, Kai Song, Kajol Jain, Laurent
Vivier, Leonardo Bras, Madhavan Srinivasan, Nathan Chancellor, Nathan Lynch, Naveen N.
Rao, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Desaulniers, Niklas Schnelle, Oliver O'Halloran, Rob Herring,
Russell Currey, Srikar Dronamraju, Stan Johnson, Tyrel Datwyler, Uwe Kleine-König, Vasant
Hegde, Wan Jiabing, Xiaoming Ni,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=f7HE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'powerpc-5.16-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux
Pull powerpc updates from Michael Ellerman:
- Enable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for Freescale 85xx platforms.
- Activate CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX by default, while still allowing it
to be disabled.
- Add support for out-of-line static calls on 32-bit.
- Fix oopses doing bpf-to-bpf calls when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is enabled.
- Fix boot hangs on e5500 due to stale value in ESR passed to
do_page_fault().
- Fix several bugs on pseries in handling of device tree cache
information for hotplugged CPUs, and/or during partition migration.
- Various other small features and fixes.
Thanks to Alexey Kardashevskiy, Alistair Popple, Anatolij Gustschin,
Andrew Donnellan, Athira Rajeev, Bixuan Cui, Bjorn Helgaas, Cédric Le
Goater, Christophe Leroy, Daniel Axtens, Daniel Henrique Barboza, Denis
Kirjanov, Fabiano Rosas, Frederic Barrat, Gustavo A. R. Silva, Hari
Bathini, Jacques de Laval, Joel Stanley, Kai Song, Kajol Jain, Laurent
Vivier, Leonardo Bras, Madhavan Srinivasan, Nathan Chancellor, Nathan
Lynch, Naveen N. Rao, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Desaulniers, Niklas
Schnelle, Oliver O'Halloran, Rob Herring, Russell Currey, Srikar
Dronamraju, Stan Johnson, Tyrel Datwyler, Uwe Kleine-König, Vasant
Hegde, Wan Jiabing, and Xiaoming Ni,
* tag 'powerpc-5.16-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: (73 commits)
powerpc/8xx: Fix Oops with STRICT_KERNEL_RWX without DEBUG_RODATA_TEST
powerpc/32e: Ignore ESR in instruction storage interrupt handler
powerpc/powernv/prd: Unregister OPAL_MSG_PRD2 notifier during module unload
powerpc: Don't provide __kernel_map_pages() without ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
MAINTAINERS: Update powerpc KVM entry
powerpc/xmon: fix task state output
powerpc/44x/fsp2: add missing of_node_put
powerpc/dcr: Use cmplwi instead of 3-argument cmpli
KVM: PPC: Tick accounting should defer vtime accounting 'til after IRQ handling
powerpc/security: Use a mutex for interrupt exit code patching
powerpc/83xx/mpc8349emitx: Make mcu_gpiochip_remove() return void
powerpc/fsl_booke: Fix setting of exec flag when setting TLBCAMs
powerpc/book3e: Fix set_memory_x() and set_memory_nx()
powerpc/nohash: Fix __ptep_set_access_flags() and ptep_set_wrprotect()
powerpc/bpf: Fix write protecting JIT code
selftests/powerpc: Use date instead of EPOCHSECONDS in mitigation-patching.sh
powerpc/64s/interrupt: Fix check_return_regs_valid() false positive
powerpc/boot: Set LC_ALL=C in wrapper script
powerpc/64s: Default to 64K pages for 64 bit book3s
Revert "powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"
...
Running program with bpf-to-bpf function calls results in data access
exception (0x300) with the below call trace:
bpf_int_jit_compile+0x238/0x750 (unreliable)
bpf_check+0x2008/0x2710
bpf_prog_load+0xb00/0x13a0
__sys_bpf+0x6f4/0x27c0
sys_bpf+0x2c/0x40
system_call_exception+0x164/0x330
system_call_vectored_common+0xe8/0x278
as bpf_int_jit_compile() tries writing to write protected JIT code
location during the extra pass.
Fix it by holding off write protection of JIT code until the extra
pass, where branch target addresses fixup happens.
Fixes: 62e3d4210a ("powerpc/bpf: Write protect JIT code")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.14+
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211025055649.114728-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Emit similar instruction sequences to commit a048a07d7f
("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel
entry/exit") when encountering BPF_NOSPEC.
Mitigations are enabled depending on what the firmware advertises. In
particular, we do not gate these mitigations based on current settings,
just like in x86. Due to this, we don't need to take any action if
mitigations are enabled or disabled at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/956570cbc191cd41f8274bed48ee757a86dac62a.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We aren't handling subtraction involving an immediate value of
0x80000000 properly. Fix the same.
Fixes: 156d0e290e ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[mpe: Fold in fix from Naveen to use imm <= 32768]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fc4b1276eb10761fd7ce0814c8dd089da2815251.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Only ignore the operation if dividing by 1.
Fixes: 156d0e290e ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c674ca18c3046885602caebb326213731c675d06.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Add checks to ensure that we never emit branch instructions with
truncated branch offsets.
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/71d33a6b7603ec1013c9734dd8bdd4ff5e929142.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Add a helper to check if a given offset is within the branch range for a
powerpc conditional branch instruction, and update some sites to use the
new helper.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/442b69a34ced32ca346a0d9a855f3f6cfdbbbd41.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.
This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.
The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.
Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit 91c960b005 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other
atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and updated all JIT
implementations to reject JIT'ing instructions with an immediate value
different from BPF_ADD. However, ppc32 BPF JIT was implemented around
the same time and didn't include the same change. Update the ppc32 JIT
accordingly.
Fixes: 51c66ad849 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/426699046d89fe50f66ecf74bd31c01eda976ba5.1625145429.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Commit 91c960b005 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other
atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and added a way to
distinguish instructions based on the immediate field. Existing JIT
implementations were updated to check for the immediate field and to
reject programs utilizing anything more than BPF_ADD (such as BPF_FETCH)
in the immediate field.
However, the check added to powerpc64 JIT did not look at the correct
BPF instruction. Due to this, such programs would be accepted and
incorrectly JIT'ed resulting in soft lockups, as seen with the atomic
bounds test. Fix this by looking at the correct immediate value.
Fixes: 91c960b005 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm")
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4117b430ffaa8cd7af042496f87fd7539e4f17fd.1625145429.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
blrl corrupts the link stack. Instead use bctrl when making function
calls from BPF programs.
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609090024.1446800-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Add the necessary call to bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() to remove write and
add exec permissions to the JIT image after it has finished being
written.
Without CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX the image will be writable and
executable until the call to bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro().
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609013431.9805-7-jniethe5@gmail.com
Commit 74451e66d5 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces") added
a default bpf_jit_free() implementation. Powerpc did not use the default
bpf_jit_free() as powerpc did not set the images read-only. The default
bpf_jit_free() called bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro() is why it could not be
used for powerpc.
Commit d53d2f78ce ("bpf: Use vmalloc special flag") moved keeping
track of read-only memory to vmalloc. This included removing
bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(). Therefore there is no reason powerpc needs
its own bpf_jit_free(). Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609013431.9805-6-jniethe5@gmail.com
If the target of a function call is within 32 Mbytes distance, use a
standard function call with 'bl' instead of the 'lis/ori/mtlr/blrl'
sequence.
In the first pass, no memory has been allocated yet and the code
position is not known yet (image pointer is NULL). This pass is there
to calculate the amount of memory to allocate for the EBPF code, so
assume the 4 instructions sequence is required, so that enough memory
is allocated.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74944a1e3e5cfecc141e440a6ccd37920e186b70.1618227846.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Implement Extended Berkeley Packet Filter on Powerpc 32
Test result with test_bpf module:
test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [354/366 JIT'ed]
Registers mapping:
[BPF_REG_0] = r11-r12
/* function arguments */
[BPF_REG_1] = r3-r4
[BPF_REG_2] = r5-r6
[BPF_REG_3] = r7-r8
[BPF_REG_4] = r9-r10
[BPF_REG_5] = r21-r22 (Args 9 and 10 come in via the stack)
/* non volatile registers */
[BPF_REG_6] = r23-r24
[BPF_REG_7] = r25-r26
[BPF_REG_8] = r27-r28
[BPF_REG_9] = r29-r30
/* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */
[BPF_REG_FP] = r17-r18
/* eBPF jit internal registers */
[BPF_REG_AX] = r19-r20
[TMP_REG] = r31
As PPC32 doesn't have a redzone in the stack, a stack frame must always
be set in order to host at least the tail count counter.
The stack frame remains for tail calls, it is set by the first callee
and freed by the last callee.
r0 is used as temporary register as much as possible. It is referenced
directly in the code in order to avoid misusing it, because some
instructions interpret it as value 0 instead of register r0
(ex: addi, addis, stw, lwz, ...)
The following operations are not implemented:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* dst /= src */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* dst %= src */
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */
The following operations are only implemented for power of two constants:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* dst %= imm */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: /* dst /= imm */
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/61d8b149176ddf99e7d5cef0b6dc1598583ca202.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
The user defined label following "fallthrough" is not considered by GCC
and causes build failure.
kernel-source/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:208:41: error: attribute
'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label [-Werror]
208 define fallthrough _attribute((fallthrough_))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: df561f6688 ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword")
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200928090023.38117-1-zhe.he@windriver.com
Move macro definitions of powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.h to
ppc-opcode.h and adopt the users of the macros accordingly. `PPC_MR()`
is defined twice in bpf_jit.h, remove the duplicate one.
Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-5-bala24@linux.ibm.com
Remove duplicate macro definitions from bpf_jit.h and reuse the macros
from ppc-opcode.h
Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-4-bala24@linux.ibm.com
Replace all the occurrences of FIELD_SIZEOF() with sizeof_field() except
at places where these are defined. Later patches will remove the unused
definition of FIELD_SIZEOF().
This patch is generated using following script:
EXCLUDE_FILES="include/linux/stddef.h|include/linux/kernel.h"
git grep -l -e "\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b" | while read file;
do
if [[ "$file" =~ $EXCLUDE_FILES ]]; then
continue
fi
sed -i -e 's/\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b/sizeof_field/g' $file;
done
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190924105839.110713-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Co-developed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> # for net
We have seen many crashes on powerpc hosts while loading bpf programs.
The problem here is that bpf_int_jit_compile() does a first pass
to compute the program length.
Then it allocates memory to store the generated program and
calls bpf_jit_build_body() a second time (and a third time
later)
What I have observed is that the second bpf_jit_build_body()
could end up using few more words than expected.
If bpf_jit_binary_alloc() put the space for the program
at the end of the allocated page, we then write on
a non mapped memory.
It appears that bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() calls
bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue() while ctx->seen might not
be stable.
Only after the second pass we can be sure ctx->seen wont be changed.
Trying to avoid a second pass seems quite complex and probably
not worth it.
Fixes: ce0761419f ("powerpc/bpf: Implement support for tail calls")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191101033444.143741-1-edumazet@google.com
Naveen N. Rao
Linus Torvalds
Hari Bathini
Ravi Bangoria
Tiezhu Yang
Daniel Borkmann
Jordan Niethe
Christophe Leroy
Brendan Jackman
He Zhe
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Balamuruhan S
Pankaj Bharadiya
Eric Dumazet
David S. Miller