...instead of splitting the initialisation over init_lseg() and
pnfs_layout_process().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If the server changed the layout stateid's "other" field, then
we should treat the old layout as being completely gone. In that
case, we want to clear the metadata such as scheduled layoutreturns.
Do this by calling pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
When determining which layout segments to return, we do want
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return to check that they match the layout
sequence id. This ensures that we don't waste time if the server
is replaying a layout recall that has already been satisfied.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
In cases where we need to send a layoutreturn in order to propagate
an error, we should not tie that to a specific layout stateid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
When we return NFS_OK to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL, we are required to
send a layoutreturn that "completes" that layout recall request, using
the correct stateid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Currently, pnfs_set_layout_stateid() will update the layout sequence
id barrier only if the stateid itself is newer than the current
layout stateid. However in a situation where multiple LAYOUTGET calls
and a LAYOUTRETURN raced, it is entirely possible for one of the
LAYOUTGET to set the current stateid to something newer than the
LAYOUTRETURN that needs to set the barrier.
The fix is to allow the "update_barrier" flag to force a check as to
whether or not the barrier needs to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If the layout stateid is invalid, then pnfs_set_layout_stateid() must
always initialise it.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Ensure that we don't carry over layoutreturn info from a previous
incarnation of this layout.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Instead of giving up altogether and falling back to doing I/O
through the MDS, which may make the situation worse, wait for
2 lease periods for the callback to resolve itself, and then
try destroying the existing layout.
Only if this was an attempt at getting a first layout, do we
give up altogether, as the server is clearly crazy.
Fixes: 183d9e7b11 ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
They are not the same error, and need to be handled differently.
Fixes: 183d9e7b11 ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
The non-retry error path is currently broken and ends up releasing the
reference to the layout twice. It also can end up clearing the
NFS_LAYOUT_FIRST_LAYOUTGET flag twice, causing a race.
In addition, the retry path will fail to decrement the plh_outstanding
counter.
Fixes: 183d9e7b11 ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
So ensure that we mark the layout for commit once the write is done,
and then ensure that the commit to ds is finished before sending
layoutcommit.
Note that by doing this, we're able to optimise away the commit
for the case of servers that don't need layoutcommit in order to
return updated attributes.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
According to RFC5661, section 12.5.3. the layout stateid is no longer
valid once the client no longer holds any layout segments. Ensure that
we mark it invalid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
As flexfiles has FF_FLAGS_NO_READ_IO, there is a need to generically
support enforcing that a IOMODE_RW segment will not allow READ I/O.
Signed-off-by: Tom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
It can return NULL if layoutgets are blocked currently. Fix it to return
-EAGAIN in that case, so we can properly handle it in pnfs_update_layout.
Also, clean up and simplify the error handling -- eliminate "status" and
just use "lseg".
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
There are several problems in the way a stateid is selected for a
LAYOUTGET operation:
We pick a stateid to use in the RPC prepare op, but that makes
it difficult to serialize LAYOUTGETs that use the open stateid. That
serialization is done in pnfs_update_layout, which occurs well before
the rpc_prepare operation.
Between those two events, the i_lock is dropped and reacquired.
pnfs_update_layout can find that the list has lsegs in it and not do any
serialization, but then later pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid ends up
choosing the open stateid.
This patch changes the client to select the stateid to use in the
LAYOUTGET earlier, when we're searching for a usable layout segment.
This way we can do it all while holding the i_lock the first time, and
ensure that we serialize any LAYOUTGET call that uses a non-layout
stateid.
This also means a rework of how LAYOUTGET replies are handled, as we
must now get the latest stateid if we want to retransmit in response
to a retryable error.
Most of those errors boil down to the fact that the layout state has
changed in some fashion. Thus, what we really want to do is to re-search
for a layout when it fails with a retryable error, so that we can avoid
reissuing the RPC at all if possible.
While the LAYOUTGET RPC is async, the initiating thread always waits for
it to complete, so it's effectively synchronous anyway. Currently, when
we need to retry a LAYOUTGET because of an error, we drive that retry
via the rpc state machine.
This means that once the call has been submitted, it runs until it
completes. So, we must move the error handling for this RPC out of the
rpc_call_done operation and into the caller.
In order to handle errors like NFS4ERR_DELAY properly, we must also
pass a pointer to the sliding timeout, which is now moved to the stack
in pnfs_update_layout.
The complicating errors are -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT and
-NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER, as those involve a timeout after which we give
up and return NULL back to the caller. So, there is some special
handling for those errors to ensure that the layers driving the retries
can handle that appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If we get back something like NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, that will be
translated into -EAGAIN, and the do/while loop in send_layoutget
will drive the call again.
This is not quite what we want, I think. An error like that is a
sign that something has changed. That something could have been a
concurrent LAYOUTGET that would give us a usable lseg.
Lift the retry logic into pnfs_update_layout instead. That allows
us to redo the layout search, and may spare us from having to issue
an RPC.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Currently, the code will clear the fail bit if we get back a fatal
error. I don't think that's correct -- we want to clear that bit
if we do not get a fatal error.
Fixes: 0bcbf039f6 (nfs: handle request add failure properly)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
LAYOUTRETURN is "special" in that servers and clients are expected to
work with old stateids. When the client sends a LAYOUTRETURN with an old
stateid in it then the server is expected to only tear down layout
segments that were present when that seqid was current. Ensure that the
client handles its accounting accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
When we want to selectively do a LAYOUTRETURN, we need to specify a
stateid that represents most recent layout acquisition that is to be
returned.
When we mark a layout stateid to be returned, we update the return
sequence number in the layout header with that value, if it's newer
than the existing one. Then, when we go to do a LAYOUTRETURN on
layout header put, we overwrite the seqid in the stateid with the
saved one, and then zero it out.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
In later patches, we're going to teach the client to be more selective
about how it returns layouts. This means keeping a record of what the
stateid's seqid was at the time that the server handed out a layout
segment.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Like other resend paths, mark the (old) hdr as NFS_IOHDR_REDO. This
ensures the hdr completion function will not count the (old) hdr
as good bytes.
Also, vector the error back through the hdr->task.tk_status like other
retry calls.
This fixes a bug with the FlexFiles layout where libaio was reporting more
bytes read than requested.
Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Replace another case where the layout 'plh_block_lgets' can trigger
infinite loops in send_layoutget().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If the server reboots while there is a layoutget outstanding, then
the call to pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid() will fail with an EAGAIN
error, which causes an infinite loop in send_layoutget(). The reason
why we never break out of the loop is that the layout 'plh_block_lgets'
field is never cleared.
Fix is to replace plh_block_lgets with NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID_STID, which
can be reset after a new layoutget.
Fixes: ab7d763e47 ("pNFS: Ensure nfs4_layoutget_prepare returns...")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
When setting the layout return mode, we must always also set the
NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED flag to ensure that we send a layoutreturn.
Otherwise pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() could set the mode, but
fail to send the layoutreturn because another is already in flight.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
We don't need to schedule a layoutreturn if the layout segment can
be freed immediately.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_BEFORE_CLOSE is being used to signal that a
layoutreturn is needed, either due to a layout recall or to a
layout error. Rename it to NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED in order
to clarify its purpose.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
The layoutreturn code currently relies on pnfs_put_lseg() to initiate the
RPC call when conditions are right. A problem arises when we want to
free the layout segment from inside an inode->i_lock section (e.g. in
pnfs_clear_request_commit()), since we cannot sleep.
The workaround is to move the actual call to pnfs_send_layoutreturn()
to pnfs_put_layout_hdr(), which doesn't have this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
* pnfs_generic:
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Cleanup constify struct pnfs_layout_range arguments
NFSv4.1/pnfs: Cleanup copying of pnfs_layout_range structures
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Cleanup pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid()
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Fix a race in initiate_file_draining()
NFSv4.1/pNFS: pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() must always return layout
NFSv4.1/pNFS: pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() should set the iomode
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Use nfs4_stateid_copy for copying stateids
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Don't pass stateids by value to pnfs_send_layoutreturn()
NFS: Relax requirements in nfs_flush_incompatible
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Don't queue up a new commit if the layout segment is invalid
NFS: Allow multiple commit requests in flight per file
NFS/pNFS: Fix up pNFS write reschedule layering violations and bugs
NFSv4: List stateid information in the callback tracepoints
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Don't return NFS4ERR_DELAY unnecessarily in CB_LAYOUTRECALL
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Ensure we enforce RFC5661 Section 12.5.5.2.1
pNFS: If we have to delay the layout callback, mark the layout for return
NFSv4.1/pNFS: Add a helper to mark the layout as returned
pNFS: Ensure nfs4_layoutget_prepare returns the correct error
Fix a bug whereby if all the layout segments could be immediately freed,
the call to pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() would never result in
a layoutreturn.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() needs to mark a layout segment for
return, then it must also set the return iomode.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If the layout segment is invalid, then we should not be adding more
write requests to the commit list. Instead, those writes should be
replayed after requesting a new layout.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If the client needs to delay the layout callback, then speed up the recall
process by marking the remaining layout segments to be actively returned
by the client.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This ensures that we don't reuse the stateid if a layout return or
implied layout return means that we've returned all layout segments
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
In pNFS/flexfiles, we want to return the layout without necessarily marking
it as having completely failed. We therefore move the call to
pnfs_layout_io_set_failed() out of pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return(),
and then ensura that pNFS/files layout calls it separately.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Trond Myklebust
Tom Haynes
Jeff Layton
Weston Andros Adamson
Kirill A. Shutemov