Граф коммитов

3 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Chunfeng Yun 259714100d PM / wakeirq: support enabling wake-up irq after runtime_suspend called
When the dedicated wake IRQ is level trigger, and it uses the
device's low-power status as the wakeup source, that means if the
device is not in low-power state, the wake IRQ will be triggered
if enabled; For this case, need enable the wake IRQ after running
the device's ->runtime_suspend() which make it enter low-power state.

e.g.
Assume the wake IRQ is a low level trigger type, and the wakeup
signal comes from the low-power status of the device.
The wakeup signal is low level at running time (0), and becomes
high level when the device enters low-power state (runtime_suspend
(1) is called), a wakeup event at (2) make the device exit low-power
state, then the wakeup signal also becomes low level.

                ------------------
               |           ^     ^|
----------------           |     | --------------
 |<---(0)--->|<--(1)--|   (3)   (2)    (4)

if enable the wake IRQ before running runtime_suspend during (0),
a wake IRQ will arise, it causes resume immediately;
it works if enable wake IRQ ( e.g. at (3) or (4)) after running
->runtime_suspend().

This patch introduces a new status WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE to
optionally support enabling wake IRQ after running ->runtime_suspend().

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-10-27 20:49:32 +02:00
Tony Lindgren db874c7e10 PM / wakeirq: Fix typo in prototype for dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq
Looks like I only built test the dev_pm_set_wake_irq and not the
dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq case on x86.

Turns out there's a typo for the dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq
prototype that causes a build error if CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST
and CONFIG_MMC_OMAP_HS are selected.

Reported-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-30 02:17:15 +02:00
Tony Lindgren 4990d4fe32 PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling
Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.

And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
device PM runtime to wake up the device.

This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.

For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
functions:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		enable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		disable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

We can replace it with just the following init and exit
time code:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-20 01:56:31 +02:00