This patch makes use of cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() instead of
cros_ec_cmd_xfer(). It allows us to remove some redundand code. In this
case, though, we are changing a bit the behaviour because of returning
-EINVAL on protocol error we propagate the error return for
cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() function, but I think it will be fine, even
more clear as we don't mask the Linux error code.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
This header file now only includes the cros_ec_dev struct, however, is the
'include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h' who contains the definition of
all the Chrome OS EC related structs. There is no reason to have a
separate include for this struct so move to the place where other
structs are defined. That way, we can remove the include itself, but also
simplify the common pattern
#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
for a single include
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
The changes to remove the cros_ec.h include were generated with the
following shell script:
git grep -l "<linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>" | xargs sed -i '/<linux\/mfd\/cros_ec.h>/d'
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform
includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that
exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or
we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the
multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of
the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and
platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart
from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes
a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are
implemented in another platform/chrome driver.
In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction
driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the
affected includes doing:
- Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file
include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- Update all the drivers with the new includes, so
- Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include
- linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Series changes: 3
- Fix dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct cros_ec_dev' (lkp)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The lightbar driver never assigned the drvdata in probe method, and
thus there is nothing there. Need to get the ec_dev from the parent's
drvdata.
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Fix sparse warning:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_debugfs.c:256:30: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_console_log_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_debugfs.c:265:30: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_pdinfo_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c:550:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_lightbar_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c:338:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c:104:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_vbc_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:408:25: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_lpc_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
This driver no longer has any pr_{level} messages. Remove the pr_fmt().
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Due to the way attribute groups visibility work, the function
cros_ec_lightbar_attrs_are_visible is called multiple times, once per
attribute, and each of these calls makes an EC transaction. For what is
worth the EC log reports multiple errors on boot when the lightbar is
not available. Instead, check if the EC has a lightbar in the probe
function and only instantiate the device.
Ideally we should have instantiate the driver only if the
EC_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR is defined, but that's not possible because that flag
is not in the very first Pixel Chromebook (Link), only on Samus. So, the
driver is instantiated by his parent always.
This patch changes a bit the actual behaviour. Before the patch if an EC
doesn't have a lightbar an empty lightbar folder is created in
/sys/class/chromeos/<ec-device-name>, after the patch the empty folder is
not created, so, the folder is only created if the lightbar exists.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The entire way how cros debugfs attibutes are created is broken.
cros_ec_sysfs should be its own driver and its attributes should be
associated with the sysfs driver not the mfd driver.
The patch also adds the sysfs documentation.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The entire way how cros sysfs attibutes are created is broken.
cros_ec_lightbar should be its own driver and its attributes should be
associated with a lightbar driver not the mfd driver. In order to retain
the path, the lightbar attributes are attached to the cros_class.
The patch also adds the sysfs documentation.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Move to_cros_ec_dev macro to cros_ec.h and use it when the private ec
object is needed from device object.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
The cros_ec_dev module is responsible for registering the MFD devices
attached to the ChromeOS EC. This patch moves this module to drivers/mfd
so calls to mfd_add_devices() are not done from outside the MFD subtree
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
This patch splits the cros_ec_devs module in two parts with a
cros_ec_dev module responsible for handling MFD devices registration and
a cros_ec_ctl module responsible for handling the various user-space
interfaces.
For consistency purpose, the driver name for the cros_ec_dev module is
now cros-ec-dev instead of cros-ec-ctl.
In the next commit, the new cros_ec_dev module will be moved to the MFD
subtree so mfd_add_devices() calls are not done from outside MFD.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
A Mutex lock in cros_ec_cmd_xfer which may be held by frozen
Userspace thread during system suspending. So should not
call this routine in suspend thread.
Signed-off-by: Jeffery Yu <jefferyy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Some devices might want to turn off the lightbar if e.g. the
system turns the screen off due to idleness. This prevents the
kernel from going through its normal suspend/resume pathways.
Signed-off-by: Eric Caruso <ejcaruso@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Don't let EC control suspend/resume sequence. If the EC controls the
lightbar and sets the sequence when it notices the chipset transitioning
between states, we can't make exceptions for cases where we don't want
to activate the lightbar. Instead, let's move the suspend/resume
notifications into the kernel so we can selectively play the sequences.
Signed-off-by: Eric Caruso <ejcaruso@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Add a program feature so we can upload and run programs for lightbar
sequences. We should be able to use this to shift sequences out of the
EC and save space there.
$ cat <suitable program bin> > /sys/devices/.../cros_ec/program
$ echo program > /sys/devices/.../cros_ec/sequence
Signed-off-by: Eric Caruso <ejcaruso@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Lightbar attributes are hidden if the ID of the device is not 0 (the
assumption being that 0 = cros_ec = might have a lightbar, 1 = cros_pd =
hide); however, sometimes these devices get IDs 1 and 2 (or something
else) instead of IDs 0 and 1. This prevents the lightbar attributes from
appearing when they should.
Proposed change is to instead check whether the name assigned to the
device is CROS_EC_DEV_NAME (true for cros_ec, false for cros_pd).
Signed-off-by: Clinton Sprain <clintonsprain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Function led_rgb_store() contains some direct returns in error cases that
leak the already allocated cros_ec_command message structure. Make sure
that 'msg' is freed in all exit paths. Detected by Coverity CID 1309666.
Signed-off-by: Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
The allocated cros_ec_command message structure is not freed in function
sequence_store(). Make sure that 'msg' is freed in all exit paths.
Detected by Coverity CID 1309667.
Signed-off-by: Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Chromebooks can have more than one Embedded Controller so the
cros_ec device id has to be incremented for each EC registered.
Add a new structure to represent multiple EC as different char
devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd). It connects to
cros_ec_device and allows sysfs inferface for cros_pd.
Also reduce number of allocated objects, make chromeos sysfs
class object a static and add refcounting to prevent object
deletion while command is in progress.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Update cros_ec_commands.h to the latest version in the EC
firmware sources and add power domain and passthru commands.
Also, update lightbar to use new command names.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Commit 1b84f2a4cd ("mfd: cros_ec: Use fixed size arrays to transfer
data with the EC") modified the struct cros_ec_command fields to not
use pointers for the input and output buffers and use fixed length
arrays instead.
This change was made because the cros_ec ioctl API uses that struct
cros_ec_command to allow user-space to send commands to the EC and
to get data from the EC. So using pointers made the API not 64-bit
safe. Unfortunately this approach was not flexible enough for all
the use-cases since there may be a need to send larger commands
on newer versions of the EC command protocol.
So to avoid to choose a constant length that it may be too big for
most commands and thus wasting memory and CPU cycles on copy from
and to user-space or having a size that is too small for some big
commands, use a zero-length array that is both 64-bit safe and
flexible. The same buffer is used for both output and input data
so the maximum of these values should be used to allocate it.
Suggested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c:254:25: sparse: duplicate const
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
This adds some sysfs entries to provide userspace control of the
four-element LED "lightbar" on the Chromebook Pixel. This only instantiates
the lightbar controls if the device actually exists.
To prevent DoS attacks, this interface is limited to 20 accesses/second,
although that rate can be adjusted by a privileged user.
On Chromebooks without a lightbar, this should have no effect. On the
Chromebook Pixel, you should be able to do things like this:
$ cd /sys/devices/virtual/chromeos/cros_ec/lightbar
$ echo 0x80 > brightness
$ echo 255 > brightness
$
$ cat sequence
S0
$ echo konami > sequence
$ cat sequence
KONAMI
$
$ cat sequence
S0
And
$ cd /sys/devices/virtual/chromeos/cros_ec/lightbar
$ echo stop > sequence
$ echo "4 255 255 255" > led_rgb
$ echo "0 255 0 0 1 0 255 0 2 0 0 255 3 255 255 0" > led_rgb
$ echo run > sequence
Test the DoS prevention with this:
$ cd /sys/devices/virtual/chromeos/cros_ec/lightbar
$ echo 500 > interval_msec
$ time (cat version version version version version version version)
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>