Граф коммитов

17 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Viresh Kumar 7f4b04614a cpufreq: create another field .flags in cpufreq_frequency_table
Currently cpufreq frequency table has two fields: frequency and driver_data.
driver_data is only for drivers' internal use and cpufreq core shouldn't use
it at all. But with the introduction of BOOST frequencies, this assumption
was broken and we started using it as a flag instead.

There are two problems due to this:
- It is against the description of this field, as driver's data is used by
  the core now.
- if drivers fill it with -3 for any frequency, then those frequencies are
  never considered by cpufreq core as it is exactly same as value of
  CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, i.e. ~2.

The best way to get this fixed is by creating another field flags which
will be used for such flags. This patch does that. Along with that various
drivers need modifications due to the change of struct cpufreq_frequency_table.

Reviewed-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-04-07 14:43:50 +02:00
Viresh Kumar 979d86fac5 cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_generic_exit()
cpufreq_generic_exit() is empty now and can be deleted.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-12 01:06:00 +01:00
Viresh Kumar ae6b427132 cpufreq: Mark ARM drivers with CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.

On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment
and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in
frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers.

Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that
will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time.

Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-06 14:17:25 +01:00
Viresh Kumar d4019f0a92 cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..

They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.

All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-31 00:11:08 +01:00
Viresh Kumar 9c0ebcf78f cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:

int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
		unsigned int relation);

And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.

So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.

This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:

int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);

CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.

This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.

It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:42:24 +02:00
Viresh Kumar fa6fa663b6 cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16 00:50:34 +02:00
Viresh Kumar 1cdf547790 cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16 00:50:30 +02:00
Viresh Kumar a86a41a13e cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the kirkwood driver.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16 00:50:25 +02:00
Viresh Kumar 6efbc777b9 cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30 20:18:42 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 09198f8fef Merge branch 'cpu_of_node' of git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn into pm-cpufreq-next
Pull DT/core/cpufreq cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 from Sudeep KarkadaNagesha.

* 'cpu_of_node' of git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn:
  cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes
  ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
  ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity
  of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index
  driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture
  ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id
  of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library
  powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures
  openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration
  microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration
2013-08-23 00:57:19 +02:00
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha e768f350c8 cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.

This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.

Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
2013-08-21 10:29:55 +01:00
Viresh Kumar adc97d6a73 cpufreq: Drop the owner field from struct cpufreq_driver
We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers
as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core.

This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-10 03:24:47 +02:00
Viresh Kumar 5070158804 cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_table
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an
index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core.  It only is useful
for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes.

Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the
assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake.

Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its
users are updated accordingly.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-04 14:25:59 +02:00
Wolfram Sang d96f733017 cpufreq / kirkwood: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resource
devm_ioremap_resource does sanity checks on the given resource. No need to
duplicate this in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-12 14:04:17 +02:00
Viresh Kumar b43a7ffbf3 cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()
policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And
their frequencies are always updated together.

Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but
the best place for this code is in cpufreq core.

This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for
all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-02 15:24:00 +02:00
Silviu-Mihai Popescu cc721c4fdf cpufreq: kirkwood: fix coccicheck warnings
Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced
devm_ioremap_resource() which provides more consistent error handling.

devm_ioremap_resource() provides its own error messages so all explicit
error messages can be removed from the failure code paths.

Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-01 01:11:35 +02:00
Andrew Lunn 2a4bd9f0db cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCs
The Marvell Kirkwood SoCs have simple cpufreq support in hardware. The
CPU can either use the a high speed cpu clock, or the slower DDR
clock. Add a driver to swap between these two clock sources.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-09 12:56:08 +01:00