Below Sparsh warnings are fixed.
Commit: drm: revocation check at drm subsystem
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:235:6: warning: symbol
'drm_hdcp_request_srm' was not declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:27:3: warning: symbol 'srm_data' was not
declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:317:5: warning: symbol 'drm_setup_hdcp_srm'
was not declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:327:6: warning: symbol
'drm_teardown_hdcp_srm' was not declared. Should it be static?
cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190513133504.18612-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
Considering the significant size of hdcp related code in drm, all
hdcp related codes are moved into separate file called drm_hdcp.c.
v2:
Rebased.
v2:
Rebased.
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190507162745.25600-7-ramalingam.c@intel.com
On every hdcp revocation check request SRM is read from fw file
/lib/firmware/display_hdcp_srm.bin
SRM table is parsed and stored at drm_hdcp.c, with functions exported
for the services for revocation check from drivers (which
implements the HDCP authentication)
This patch handles the HDCP1.4 and 2.2 versions of SRM table.
v2:
moved the uAPI to request_firmware_direct() [Daniel]
v3:
kdoc added. [Daniel]
srm_header unified and bit field definitions are removed. [Daniel]
locking improved. [Daniel]
vrl length violation is fixed. [Daniel]
v4:
s/__swab16/be16_to_cpu [Daniel]
be24_to_cpu is done through a global func [Daniel]
Unused variables are removed. [Daniel]
unchecked return values are dropped from static funcs [Daniel]
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Acked-by: Satyeshwar Singh <satyeshwar.singh@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190507162745.25600-5-ramalingam.c@intel.com