When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We are going to have many extent_roots soon, and we don't need a root
here necessarily as we're not modifying anything, we're just getting the
trans handle so we can have an accurate view of references, so use the
tree_root here.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we're looking for leafs that point to a data extent we want to record
the extent items that point at our bytenr. At this point we have the
reference and we know for a fact that this leaf should have a reference
to our bytenr. However if there's some sort of corruption we may not
find any references to our leaf, and thus could end up with eie == NULL.
Replace this BUG_ON() with an ASSERT() and then return -EUCLEAN for the
mortals.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We search for an extent entry with .offset = -1, which shouldn't be a
thing, but corruption happens. Add an ASSERT() for the developers,
return -EUCLEAN for mortals.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We define __TRANS_DUMMY always, so this extra ifdef stuff is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This comment was much closer to the related code when it was originally
added, but has slowly migrated north far from its ancestral lands. Move
it back down with its people.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We pass in the path, but use btrfs_next_item() using the root we
searched with. Pass the root down to add_keyed_refs() instead of the
fs_info so we can continue to use the same root we searched with.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values,
rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr()
helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then
rename all of the callers to the new helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have this pattern in a lot of places
item = btrfs_item_nr(slot);
btrfs_item_size(leaf, item);
when we could simply use
btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot);
Fix all callers of btrfs_item_size() and btrfs_item_offset() to use the
_nr variation of the helpers.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently all the callers of btrfs_find_all_roots() pass a value of false
for its ignore_offset argument. This makes the argument pointless and we
can remove it and make btrfs_find_all_roots() always pass false as the
ignore_offset argument for btrfs_find_all_roots_safe(). So just do that.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Using a transaction in btrfs_search_slot is only useful when we are
searching to add or modify the tree. When the function is used for
searching, insert length and mod arguments are 0, there is no need to
use a transaction.
No functional changes, changing for consistency.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a
NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function
take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold
a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction
commit from wiping out commit roots.
However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where
we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree,
namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate
or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem
because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be
acquired before locking any extent buffer.
Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent
buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158
from fstests, it reported the following trace:
[ 9057.626435] ======================================================
[ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted
[ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.632542]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.635255]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 9057.636292]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 9057.637240]
-> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140
[ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300
[ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 9057.645835]
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 9057.658030]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1
[ 9057.660402] ---- ----
[ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.663690]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781:
[ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.670408]
stack backtrace:
[ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1
[ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[ 9057.674258] Call Trace:
[ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110
[ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the
commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post().
We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots()
from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref
lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and
therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called
from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write
lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The tree modification log, which records modifications done to btrees, is
quite large and currently spread all over ctree.c, which is a huge file
already.
To make things better organized, move all that code into its own separate
source and header files. Functions and definitions that are used outside
of the module (mostly by ctree.c) are renamed so that they start with a
"btrfs_" prefix. Everything else remains unchanged.
This makes it easier to go over the tree modification log code every
time I need to go read it to fix a bug.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor comment updates ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The backref code is looking for a reloc_root that corresponds to the
given fs root. However any number of things could have gone wrong while
initializing that reloc_root, like ENOMEM while trying to allocate the
root itself, or EIO while trying to write the root item. This would
result in no corresponding reloc_root being in the reloc root cache, and
thus would return NULL when we do the find_reloc_root() call.
Because of this we do not want to WARN_ON(). This presumably was meant
to catch developer errors, cases where we messed up adding the reloc
root. However we can easily hit this case with error injection, and
thus should not do a WARN_ON().
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Zygo reported the following panic when testing my error handling patches
for relocation:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/backref.c:2545!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 PID: 8472 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 14
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
Call Trace:
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x4df/0x530
build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
? release_extent_buffer+0x225/0x280
? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2a6/0xb60
? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x35/0x50
? do_relocation+0xc10/0xc10
? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x6a3/0xcb0
? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
? rb_insert_color+0x342/0x360
? add_tree_block.isra.36+0x236/0x2b0
relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
? merge_reloc_roots+0x470/0x470
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x18f0
? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
? lock_contended+0x620/0x6e0
? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e0/0x1e0
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1f9/0x460
btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4380
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags+0x26/0x30
? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This occurs because of this check
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&upper->rb_node))
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->upper));
As we are dropping the backref node, if we discover that our upper node
in the edge we just cleaned up isn't linked into the cache that we are
now done with this node, thus the BUG_ON().
However this is an erroneous assumption, as we will look up all the
references for a node first, and then process the pending edges. All of
the 'upper' nodes in our pending edges won't be in the cache's rb_tree
yet, because they haven't been processed. We could very well have many
edges still left to cleanup on this node.
The fact is we simply do not need this check, we can just process all of
the edges only for this node, because below this check we do the
following
if (list_empty(&upper->lower)) {
list_add_tail(&upper->lower, &cache->leaves);
upper->lowest = 1;
}
If the upper node truly isn't used yet, then we add it to the
cache->leaves list to be cleaned up later. If it is still used then the
last child node that has it linked into its node will add it to the
leaves list and then it will be cleaned up.
Fix this problem by dropping this logic altogether. With this fix I no
longer see the panic when testing with error injection in the backref
code.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Zygo reported the following KASAN splat:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836
CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9
? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210
? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11
? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37
? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
__asan_load8+0x69/0x90
btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0
relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780
? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0
? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags+0x26/0x30
? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427
Allocated by task 28836:
kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
__kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0
kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0
btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0
btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0
build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Freed by task 28836:
kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30
kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30
__kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140
kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
kfree+0xde/0x200
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530
build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This occurred because we freed our backref node in
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in
btrfs_backref_release_cache(). This is because
btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the
cache->leaves nodes and free them up. However
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with
btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node
without unlinking it from the cache. Change this to a
btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and
removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the
remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped.
Fixes: 75bfb9aff4 ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we
need to know the owner of the block. For non-refcounted trees this is
straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from.
For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted
trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-<level>.
Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid
we're using. In places like relocation and backref we could probably
unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it,
otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be
a refcounted tree anyway.
This is a preparation patch for further changes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem
patches on btrfs/104:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0+ #102 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x40/0x130
caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0
btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520
process_one_work+0x238/0x540
worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
kthread+0x13a/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510
find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
__btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x40/0x130
find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
__btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
__btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
kthread+0x13a/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903:
#0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140
#1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0
#2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #102
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
__lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
? __bfs+0x42/0x210
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
__btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110
btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50
kthread+0x13a/0x150
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled
BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents
This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a
delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect
ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read
lock on the tree_root nodes.
To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches
the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search
using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root
nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In btrfs_orphan_cleanup, there's another instance of fs_info, but it's
the same as the one we already have.
In btrfs_backref_finish_upper_links, rb_node is same type and used
as temporary cursor to the tree.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The `if (!ret)` check will always be false and it may result in
ret->path being dereferenced while it is a NULL pointer.
Fixes: a37f232b7b ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boleyn Su <boleynsu@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The main function to lookup a root by its id btrfs_get_fs_root takes the
whole key, while only using the objectid. The value of offset is preset
to (u64)-1 but not actually used until btrfs_find_root that does the
actual search.
Switch btrfs_get_fs_root to use only objectid and remove all local
variables that existed just for the lookup. The actual key for search is
set up in btrfs_get_fs_root, reusing another key variable.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The name BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS is not very clear about the meaning.
In fact, that bit can only be set to those trees:
- Subvolume roots
- Data reloc root
- Reloc roots for above roots
All other trees won't get this bit set. So just by the result, it is
obvious that, roots with this bit set can have tree blocks shared with
other trees. Either shared by snapshots, or by reloc roots (an special
snapshot created by relocation).
This patch will rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE to
make it easier to understand, and update all comment mentioning
"reference counted" to follow the rename.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For relocation tree detection, relocation backref cache uses
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() which uses relocation-specific checks
like checking the DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit.
However for general purpose backref cache, we can rely on that check, as
it's possible that relocation is also running.
For generic purposed backref cache, we detect reloc root by
SHARED_BLOCK_REF item. Only reloc root node has its parent bytenr
pointing back to itself.
And in that case, backref cache will mark the reloc root node useless,
dropping any child orphan nodes.
So only call btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() if the backref cache is
for relocation.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The error cleanup will be extracted as a new function,
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), and moved to backref.c and exported for
later usage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This the the 2nd major part of generic backref cache. Move it to
backref.c so we can reuse it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is the major part of backref cache build process, move it
to backref.c so we can reuse it later.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we're releasing all existing nodes/edges, other than cleanup the
mess after error, "release" is a more proper naming here.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Also add comment explaining the cleanup progress, to differ it from
btrfs_backref_drop_node().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function will go to the next inline/keyed backref for
btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Due to the complex nature of btrfs extent tree, when we want to iterate
all backrefs of one extent, this involves quite a lot of work, like
searching the EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM, iteration through inline and keyed
backrefs.
Normally this would result in a complex code, something like:
btrfs_search_slot()
/* Ensure we are at EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM */
while (1) { /* Loop for extent tree items */
while (ptr < end) { /* Loop for inlined items */
/* Real work here */
}
next:
ret = btrfs_next_item()
/* Ensure we're still at keyed item for specified bytenr */
}
The idea of btrfs_backref_iter is to avoid such complex and hard to
read code structure, but something like the following:
iter = btrfs_backref_iter_alloc();
ret = btrfs_backref_iter_start(iter, bytenr);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
for (; ; ret = btrfs_backref_iter_next(iter)) {
/* Real work here */
}
out:
btrfs_backref_iter_free(iter);
This patch is just the skeleton + btrfs_backref_iter_start() code.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Some older compilers like gcc-4.8 warn about mismatched curly braces in
a initializer:
fs/btrfs/backref.c: In function 'is_shared_data_backref':
fs/btrfs/backref.c:394:9: error: missing braces around
initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]
struct prelim_ref target = {0};
^
fs/btrfs/backref.c:394:9: error: (near initialization for
'target.rbnode') [-Werror=missing-braces]
Use the GNU empty initializer extension to avoid this.
Fixes: ed58f2e66e ("btrfs: backref, don't add refs from shared block when resolving normal backref")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Zygo reported a deadlock where a task was stuck in the inode logical
resolve code. The deadlock looks like this
Task 1
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino
->iterate_inodes_from_logical
->iterate_extent_inodes
->path->search_commit_root isn't set, so a transaction is started
->resolve_indirect_ref for a root that's being deleted
->search for our key, attempt to lock a node, DEADLOCK
Task 2
btrfs_drop_snapshot
->walk down to a leaf, lock it, walk up, lock node
->end transaction
->start transaction
-> wait_cur_trans
Task 3
btrfs_commit_transaction
->wait_event(cur_trans->write_wait, num_writers == 1) DEADLOCK
We are holding a transaction open in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino while we
try to resolve our references. btrfs_drop_snapshot() holds onto its
locks while it stops and starts transaction handles, because it assumes
nobody is going to touch the root now. Commit just does what commit
does, waiting for the writers to finish, blocking any new trans handles
from starting.
Fix this by making the backref code not try to resolve backrefs of roots
that are currently being deleted. This will keep us from walking into a
snapshot that's currently being deleted.
This problem was harder to hit before because we rarely broke out of the
snapshot delete halfway through, but with my delayed ref throttling code
it happened much more often. However we've always been able to do this,
so it's not a new problem.
Fixes: 8da6d5815c ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we have proper root ref counting everywhere we can kill the
subvol_srcu.
* removal of fs_info::subvol_srcu reduces size of fs_info by 1176 bytes
* the refcount_t used for the references checks for accidental 0->1
in cases where the root lifetime would not be properly protected
* there's a leak detector for roots to catch unfreed roots at umount
time
* SRCU served us well over the years but is was not a proper
synchronization mechanism for some cases
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In relocation, we need to locate all parent tree leaves referring to one
data extent, thus we have a complex mechanism to iterate throught extent
tree and subvolume trees to locate the related leaves.
However this is already done in backref.c, we have
btrfs_find_all_leafs(), which can return a ulist containing all leaves
referring to that data extent.
Use btrfs_find_all_leafs() to replace find_data_references().
There is a special handling for v1 space cache data extents, where we
need to delete the v1 space cache data extents, to avoid those data
extents to hang the data relocation.
In this patch, the special handling is done by re-iterating the root
tree leaf. Although it's a little less efficient than the old handling,
considering we can reuse a lot of code, it should be acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With the following patches:
- btrfs: backref, only collect file extent items matching backref offset
- btrfs: backref, not adding refs from shared block when resolving normal backref
- btrfs: backref, only search backref entries from leaves of the same root
we only collect the normal data refs we want, so the imprecise upper
bound total_refs of that EXTENT_ITEM could now be changed to the count
of the normal backref entry we want to search.
Background and how the patches fit together:
Btrfs has two types of data backref.
For BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY type of backref, we don't have the
exact block number. Therefore, we need to call resolve_indirect_refs.
It uses btrfs_search_slot to locate the leaf block. Then
we need to walk through the leaves to search for the EXTENT_DATA items
that have disk bytenr matching the extent item (add_all_parents).
When resolving indirect refs, we could take entries that don't
belong to the backref entry we are searching for right now.
For that reason when searching backref entry, we always use total
refs of that EXTENT_ITEM rather than individual count.
For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize
extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10 #1
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 1048576 count 3 #2
extent data backref root 256 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 6 #3
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5 #4
For example, when searching backref entry #4, we'll use total_refs
24, a very loose loop ending condition, instead of total_refs = 5.
But using total_refs = 24 is not accurate. Sometimes, we'll never find
all the refs from specific root. As a result, the loop keeps on going
until we reach the end of that inode.
The first 3 patches, handle 3 different types refs we might encounter.
These refs do not belong to the normal backref we are searching, and
hence need to be skipped.
This patch changes the total_refs to correct number so that we could
end loop as soon as we find all the refs we want.
btrfs send uses backref to find possible clone sources, the following
is a simple test to compare the results with and without this patch:
$ btrfs subvolume create /sub1
$ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=64K count=1 seek=$((i-1)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
done
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot /sub1 /sub2
$ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=4K count=1 seek=$(((i-1)*16+10)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
done
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /sub1 /snap1
$ time btrfs send /snap1 | btrfs receive /volume2
Without this patch:
real 69m48.124s
user 0m50.199s
sys 70m15.600s
With this patch:
real 1m59.683s
user 0m35.421s
sys 2m42.684s
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
[ add patchset cover letter with background and numbers ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We could have some nodes/leaves in subvolume whose owner are not the
that subvolume. In this way, when we resolve normal backrefs of that
subvolume, we should avoid collecting those references from these blocks.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All references from the block of SHARED_DATA_REF belong to that shared
block backref.
For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize 95
extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5
extent data backref root 258 objectid 265 offset 0 count 9
shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10
Block 394985472 might be leaf from root 257, and the item obejctid and
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) in that leaf just happens to be
260 and 65536 which is equal to the first extent data backref entry.
Before this patch, when we resolve backref:
root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536
we will add those refs in block 394985472 and wrongly treat those as the
refs we want.
Fix this by checking if the leaf we are processing is shared data
backref, if so, just skip this leaf.
Shared data refs added into preftrees.direct have all entry value = 0
(root_id = 0, key = NULL, level = 0) except parent entry.
Other refs from indirect tree will have key value and root id != 0, and
these values won't be changed when their parent is resolved and added to
preftrees.direct. Therefore, we could reuse the preftrees.direct and
search ref with all values = 0 except parent is set to avoid getting
those resolved refs block.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When resolving one backref of type EXTENT_DATA_REF, we collect all
references that simply reference the EXTENT_ITEM even though their
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) are not the same as the
btrfs_extent_data_ref::offset we are searching for.
This patch adds additional check so that we only collect references whose
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) == btrfs_extent_data_ref::offset.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We are now using these for all roots, rename them to btrfs_put_root()
and btrfs_grab_root();
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that all callers of btrfs_get_fs_root are subsequently calling
btrfs_grab_fs_root and handling dropping the ref when they are done
appropriately, go ahead and push btrfs_grab_fs_root up into
btrfs_get_fs_root.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're looking up a random root, we need to hold a ref on it while we're
using it.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fiemap handler locks a file range that can have unflushed delalloc,
and after locking the range, it tries to attach to a running transaction.
If the running transaction started its commit, that is, it is in state
TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, and either the filesystem was mounted with the
flushoncommit option or the transaction is creating a snapshot for the
subvolume that contains the file that fiemap is operating on, we end up
deadlocking. This happens because fiemap is blocked on the transaction,
waiting for it to complete, and the transaction is waiting for the flushed
dealloc to complete, which requires locking the file range that the fiemap
task already locked. The following stack traces serve as an example of
when this deadlock happens:
(...)
[404571.515510] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
[404571.515956] Call Trace:
[404571.516360] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.516730] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.517104] lock_extent_bits+0x1ec/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[404571.517465] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.517832] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x292/0x800 [btrfs]
[404571.518202] normal_work_helper+0xea/0x530 [btrfs]
[404571.518566] process_one_work+0x21e/0x5c0
[404571.518990] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3b0
[404571.519413] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[404571.519829] kthread+0x103/0x140
[404571.520191] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
[404571.520565] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[404571.520915] kworker/u8:6 D 0 31651 2 0x80004000
[404571.521290] Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_flush_delalloc_helper [btrfs]
(...)
[404571.537000] fsstress D 0 13117 13115 0x00004000
[404571.537263] Call Trace:
[404571.537524] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.537788] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.538066] wait_current_trans+0xc8/0x100 [btrfs]
[404571.538349] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.538680] start_transaction+0x33c/0x500 [btrfs]
[404571.539076] btrfs_check_shared+0xa3/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[404571.539513] ? extent_fiemap+0x2ce/0x650 [btrfs]
[404571.539866] extent_fiemap+0x2ce/0x650 [btrfs]
[404571.540170] do_vfs_ioctl+0x526/0x6f0
[404571.540436] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[404571.540734] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[404571.540997] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1d0
[404571.541279] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
(...)
[404571.543729] btrfs D 0 14210 14208 0x00004000
[404571.544023] Call Trace:
[404571.544275] ? __schedule+0x3ae/0x7b0
[404571.544526] ? wait_for_completion+0x112/0x1a0
[404571.544795] schedule+0x3a/0xb0
[404571.545064] schedule_timeout+0x1ff/0x390
[404571.545351] ? lock_acquire+0xa6/0x190
[404571.545638] ? wait_for_completion+0x49/0x1a0
[404571.545890] ? wait_for_completion+0x112/0x1a0
[404571.546228] wait_for_completion+0x131/0x1a0
[404571.546503] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[404571.546775] btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0x27c/0x400 [btrfs]
[404571.547159] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x3b0/0xae0 [btrfs]
[404571.547449] ? btrfs_mksubvol+0x4a4/0x640 [btrfs]
[404571.547703] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[404571.547969] btrfs_mksubvol+0x605/0x640 [btrfs]
[404571.548226] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0x1c0
[404571.548512] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x24/0x50
[404571.548789] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x169/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[404571.549048] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11d/0x170 [btrfs]
[404571.549307] btrfs_ioctl+0x133f/0x3150 [btrfs]
[404571.549549] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x4c/0xd0
[404571.549792] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x84/0x4b0
[404571.550064] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xe3e/0x11f0
[404571.550306] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[404571.550608] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30
[404571.550976] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xedf/0x11f0
[404571.551319] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[404571.551659] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[404571.552087] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
[404571.552355] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[404571.552621] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[404571.552864] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1d0
[404571.553104] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
(...)
If we were joining the transaction instead of attaching to it, we would
not risk a deadlock because a join only blocks if the transaction is in a
state greater then or equals to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING, and the delalloc
flush performed by a transaction is done before it reaches that state,
when it is in the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START. However a transaction
join is intended for use cases where we do modify the filesystem, and
fiemap only needs to peek at delayed references from the current
transaction in order to determine if extents are shared, and, besides
that, when there is no current transaction or when it blocks to wait for
a current committing transaction to complete, it creates a new transaction
without reserving any space. Such unnecessary transactions, besides doing
unnecessary IO, can cause transaction aborts (-ENOSPC) and unnecessary
rotation of the precious backup roots.
So fix this by adding a new transaction join variant, named join_nostart,
which behaves like the regular join, but it does not create a transaction
when none currently exists or after waiting for a committing transaction
to complete.
Fixes: 03628cdbc6 ("Btrfs: do not start a transaction during fiemap")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik
Filipe Manana
Marcos Paulo de Souza
David Sterba
Nikolay Borisov
Boleyn Su
Qu Wenruo
Arnd Bergmann
ethanwu