Граф коммитов

17 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Burman Yan 95b93a0cd4 [MTD] replace kmalloc+memset with kzalloc
Signed-off-by: Yan Burman <yan_952@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-11-28 23:47:21 +00:00
Vitaly Wool 7014568bad [MTD] [NAND] remove len/ooblen confusion.
As was discussed between Ricard Wanderlöf, David Woodhouse, Artem 
Bityutskiy and me, the current API for reading/writing OOB is confusing. 

The thing that introduces confusion is the need to specify ops.len 
together with ops.ooblen for reads/writes that concern only OOB not data 
area. So, ops.len is overloaded: when ops.datbuf != NULL it serves to 
specify the length of the data read, and when ops.datbuf == NULL, it 
serves to specify the full OOB read length.

The patch inlined below is the slightly updated version of the previous 
patch serving the same purpose, but with the new Artem's comments taken 
into account.

Artem, BTW, thanks a lot for your valuable input!

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-11-28 22:39:03 +00:00
David Woodhouse 4bf63fcb83 [MTD NAND] Allocate chip->buffers separately to allow it to be overridden
In particular, the board driver might need it to be DMAable.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-09-25 17:08:04 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner f1a28c0284 [MTD] NAND Expose the new raw mode function and status info to userspace
The raw read/write access to NAND (without ECC) has been changed in the
NAND rework. Expose the new way - setting the file mode via ioctl - to
userspace. Also allow to read out the ecc statistics information so userspace
tools can see that bitflips happened and whether errors where correctable
or not. Also expose the number of bad blocks for the partition, so nandwrite
can check if the data fits into the parition before writing to it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-30 00:37:34 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 8593fbc68b [MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely
Hopefully the last iteration on this!

The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless
discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular
problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the
resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided
to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write
functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the
read/write _oob functions in mtd.

The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation
descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at
least seven arguments.

read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do
the following tasks:

- read/write out of band data
- read/write data content and out of band data
- read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled)

struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode.

Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for
diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation,
the other two modes are for mtd clients:

MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is
described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's
up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC
placement algorithms.

MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in
the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout
data structre which is associated to the devicee.

The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the
setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then
the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write
data routines are invoked.

Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible
regressions for your particular device / application scenario

Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot
air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in
the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the
existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD
interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's
easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go
for a real solution.

Improvements and bugfixes are welcome!

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 15:06:51 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner f75e5097ef [MTD] NAND modularize write function
Modularize the write function and reorganaize the internal buffer
management. Remove obsolete chip options and fixup all affected
users.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-26 18:52:08 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 9223a456da [MTD] Remove read/write _ecc variants
MTD clients are agnostic of FLASH which needs ECC suppport.
Remove the functions and fixup the callers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-23 17:21:03 +02:00
Joern Engel 28318776a8 [MTD] Introduce writesize
At least two flashes exists that have the concept of a minimum write unit,
similar to NAND pages, but no other NAND characteristics.  Therefore, rename
the minimum write unit to "writesize" for all flashes, including NAND.

Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
2006-05-22 23:18:05 +02:00
David Woodhouse e0c7d76753 [MTD NAND] Indent all of drivers/mtd/nand/*.c.
It was just too painful to deal with.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-13 18:07:53 +01:00
David Woodhouse 6943f8af7d [MTD NAND] Reduce paranoia level when scanning for bad blocks on virgin chips
We were scanning for 0xFF through the entire chip -- which takes a while
when it's a 512MiB device as I have on my current toy. The specs only say
we need to check certain bytes -- so do only that.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-13 16:14:26 +01:00
David Woodhouse c3f8abf481 [MTD NAND] Use vmalloc for buffer when scanning for bad blocks.
These new chips have 128KiB blocks. Don't try to kmalloc that.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-13 04:03:42 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner 61b03bd7c3 [MTD] NAND: Clean up trailing white spaces
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-07 15:10:37 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner 19870da7ea [MTD] NAND: Fix broken bad block scan for 16 bit devices
The previous change to read a single byte from oob breaks the
bad block scan on 16 bit devices, when the byte is on an odd
address. Read the complete oob for now.
Remove the unused arguments from check_short_pattern()
Move the wait for ready function so it is only executed when
consecutive reads happen.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-07-16 09:27:52 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner c9e0536523 [MTD] NAND: Fix broken bad block table scan
Make the bad block table search functional again

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-06-29 14:24:41 +02:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy 171650af9c [MTD] NAND: Fix bad block table scan for small page devices
Scan 1st and 2nd pages of SP devices for BB marker by default.
Fix more then one page scanning in create_bbt.c.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:38:33 +02:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy eeada24da8 [MTD] NAND: Read only OOB bytes during bad block scan
When scanning NAND for bad blocks, don't read the whole page, read
only needed OOB bytes instead. Also check the return code of the
nand_read_raw() function. Correctly free the this->bbt array in
case of failure. Tested with Large page NAND.

Fix debugging message.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:32:18 +02:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00