Many ARM platforms do not provide a mach/cpu.h so rather than guarding
the use of that header with CONFIG_ARM guard it with the guards used
when testing for the OMAP variants in the body of the code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
* master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm:
TWL4030: fix clk API usage
[ARM] 5364/1: allow flush_ioremap_region() to be used from modules
[ARM] w90x900: fix build errors and warnings
[ARM] i.MX add missing include
[ARM] i.MX: fix breakage from commit 278892736e
[ARM] i.MX: remove LCDC controller register definitions from imx-regs.h
Always pass a struct device if one is available; and there's really
no reason for the processor specific stuff in this file if only
people would follow the API usage properly by using the struct device.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Fixes:
drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c:657: error: implicit declaration of function
'cpu_is_omap2430'
Not the nicest fix, but this should be improved by a better OMAP clock API
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
This is a fix for:
twl4030-core.c:(.text+0x16a797): undefined reference to `clk_get_rate'
twl4030-core.c:(.text+0x16a797): undefined reference to `clk_put'
on x86 and x86_64, as the clock API is not defined on those platforms.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
This contains two bugfixes to the initial twl4030 regulator
support patch related to USB:
(a) always overwrite the old list of consumers ... else
the regulator handles all use the same "usb1v5" name;
(b) don't set up the "usbcp" regulator, which turns out
to be managed through separate controls, usually ULPI
directly from the OTG controller.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Initial code to create twl4030 voltage regulator devices, using
the new regulator framework. Note that this now starts to care
what name is used to declare the TWL chip:
- TWL4030 is the "old" chip; newer ones have a bigger variety
of VAUX2 voltages.
- TWL5030 is the core "new" chip; TPS65950 is its catalog version.
- The TPS65930 and TPS65920 are cost-reduced catalog versions of
TWL5030 parts ... fewer regulators, no battery charger, etc.
Board-specific regulator configuration should be provided, listing
which regulators are used and their constraints (e.g. 1.8V only).
Code that could ("should"?) leverage the regulator stuff includes
TWL4030 USB transceiver support and MMC glue, LCD support for the
3430SDP and Labrador boards, and S-Video output.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Minor cleanup to twl4030-core: define a helper function to populate
a single child node, and use it to replace six inconsistent versions
of the same logic. Both object and source code shrink.
As part of this, some devices now have more IRQ resources: battery
charger, keypad, ADC, and USB transceiver. That helps to remove some
irq #defines that block the children's drivers code from compiling on
non-OMAP platforms.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Minor change to the TWL4030 utility interface: support reads
of all 256 bytes in each register bank (vs just 255). This
can help when debugging, but is otherwise a NOP.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
- Move it into a separate file; clean and streamline it
- Restructure the init code for reuse during secondary dispatch
- Support both levels (primary, secondary) of IRQ dispatch
- Use a workqueue for irq mask/unmask and trigger configuration
Code for two subchips currently share that secondary handler code.
One is the power subchip; its IRQs are now handled by this core,
courtesy of this patch. The other is the GPIO module, which will
be supported through a later patch.
There are also minor changes to the header file, mostly related
to GPIO support; nothing yet in mainline cares about those. A
few references to OMAP-specific symbols are disabled; when they
can all be removed, the TWL4030 support ceases being OMAP-specific.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Simplify twl4030 IRQ handling by removing a needless custom flow
handler. The top level IRQs, from the PIH, are well suited for
handle_simple_irq() ... they can't be acked or masked.
Switching resolves some issues with how IRQs were dispatched.
Notably, abuse of desc->status, IRQ accounting, and handling
of various faults.
In short, use standard genirq code.
Drivers that request_irq() to the PIH will need to pay more
attention to things like setting IRQF_DISABLED (since it's
no longer ignored), and making I2C calls from handlers (you'll
need a lockdep workaround).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
This patch adds the core of the TWL4030 driver, which supports
chips including the TPS65950. These chips are multi-function; see
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tps65950.html
Public specs are in the works. For now, the block diagram on
the second page of the datasheet is fairly informative.
There are some known issues with this core code. Most notably,
the IRQ dispatching needs simplification (to use more of genirq),
generalization (integrating support for secondary IRQ dispatch
as well as primary, and removing the build dependency on OMAP),
and then probably updating to leverage threaded IRQ support
(expected to arrive in mainline "soon").
Once the core is in mainline, drivers for other parts of this
chip can follow its lead and start swimming upstream too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Mark Brown
Linus Torvalds
Russell King
Samuel Ortiz
David Brownell