Several gpiolib functions receive pointer to struct device_node which is
later passed to OF functions. These OF functions accept already pointer
to const, so gpiolib can follow similar approach to indicate they are
not modifying the struct device_node.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
If all we want to manage is a single pointer, there's no need to
manually allocate and add a new devres. We can simply use
devm_add_action_or_reset() and shrink the code by a good bit.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Several places in the code are using same idiom, i.e.
IS_ERR(desc) && PTR_ERR(desc) == -ENOENT
which meaning is GPIO description is not found.
For better readability extract gpiod_not_found() helper and use it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Commit 959bc7b22b ("gpio: Automatically add lockdep keys") documents
in its commits message its intention to "create a unique class key for
each driver".
It does so by having gpiochip_add_data add in-place the definition of
two static lockdep classes for LOCKDEP use. That way, every caller of
the macro adds their gpiochip with unique lockdep classes.
There are many indirect callers of gpiochip_add_data, however, via
use of devm_gpiochip_add_data. devm_gpiochip_add_data has external
linkage and all its users will share the same lockdep classes, which
probably is not intended.
Fix this by replicating the gpio_chip_add_data statics-in-macro for
the devm_ version as well.
Fixes: 959bc7b22b ("gpio: Automatically add lockdep keys")
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200731123835.8003-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
These two devres functions devm_gpiochip_[add|remove]()
were in the wrong file. They should be in gpiolib-devres.c
not gpiolib.c.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200313081522.35143-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This introduces fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that iterates through common gpio
suffixes when trying to locate a GPIO within a given firmware node.
We also switch devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() to call
fwnode_gpiod_get_index() instead of iterating through GPIO suffixes on
its own.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190913032240.50333-3-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() is too long, besides the fwnode
in question does not have to be a child of device node. Let's rename it
to devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() and keep the old name for compatibility
for now.
Also let's add a devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() wrapper as majority of the
callers need a single GPIO.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190913032240.50333-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Change all exported symbols for managed GPIO functions from
EXPORT_SYMBOL() to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), like is used for their
non-managed counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190906084539.21838-5-geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a function named devm_gpiod_unhinge() that removes
the resource management from a GPIO descriptor.
I am not sure if this is the best anglosaxon name for the
function, no other managed resources have an equivalent
currently, but I chose "unhinge" as the closest intuitive
thing I could imagine that fits Rusty Russell's API design
criterions "the obvious use is the correct one" and
"the name tells you how to use it".
The idea came out of a remark from Mark Brown that it should
be possible to handle over management of a resource from
devres to the regulator core, and indeed we can do that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When we get a nonexeclusive GPIO descriptor using managed
resources, we should only add it to the list of managed
resources once: on the first user. Augment the
devm_gpiod_get_index() and devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
calls to account for this by checking if the descriptor
is already resource managed before we proceed to allocate
a new resource management struct.
Fixes: b0ce7b29bf ("regulator/gpio: Allow nonexclusive GPIO access")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
All the other core files are named "gpiolib-<something>" so
let's rename the devres as well so we have some logical
namespacing here.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Krzysztof Kozlowski
Bartosz Golaszewski
Andy Shevchenko
Ahmad Fatoum
Linus Walleij
Masahiro Yamada
Dmitry Torokhov
Geert Uytterhoeven