Since all the primitive elements used for the notification done by ipmr
are now common [mr_table, mr_mfc, vif_device] we can refactor the logic
for dumping them to a common file.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The various MFC entries are being held in the same kind of mr_tables
for both ipmr and ip6mr, and their traversal logic is identical.
Also, with the exception of the addresses [and other small tidbits]
the major bulk of the nla setting is identical.
Unite as much of the dumping as possible between the two.
Notice this requires creating an mr_table iterator for each, as the
for-each preprocessor macro can't be used by the common logic.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Same as previously done with the mfc seq, the logic for the vif seq is
refactored to be shared between ipmr and ip6mr.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
With the exception of the final dump, ipmr and ip6mr have the exact same
seq logic for traversing a given mr_table. Refactor that code and make
it common.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ipmr and ip6mr utilize the exact same methods for searching the
hashed resolved connections, difference being only in the construction
of the hash comparison key.
In order to unite the flow, introduce an mr_table operation set that
would contain the protocol specific information required for common
flows, in this case - the hash parameters and a comparison key
representing a (*,*) route.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Now that both ipmr and ip6mr are using the same mr_table structure,
we can have a common function to allocate & initialize a new instance.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The two implementations have almost identical structures - vif_device and
mif_device. As a step toward uniforming the mr_tables, eliminate the
mif_device and relocate the vif_device definition into a new common
header file.
Also, introduce a common initializing function for setting most of the
vif_device fields in a new common source file. This requires modifying
the ipv{4,6] Kconfig and ipv4 makefile as we're introducing a new common
config option - CONFIG_IP_MROUTE_COMMON.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Yuval Mintz