Fix gcc W=1 warning:
fs/nfs_common/grace.c:91: warning: Function parameter or member 'net' not described in 'locks_in_grace'
Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:
- Have no license information of any form
- Have MODULE_LICENCE("GPL*") inside which was used in the initial
scan/conversion to ignore the file
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
restart_grace() uses hardcoded init_net.
It can cause to "list_add double add" in following scenario:
1) nfsd and lockd was started in several net namespaces
2) nfsd in init_net was stopped (lockd was not stopped because
it have users from another net namespaces)
3) lockd got signal, called restart_grace() -> set_grace_period()
and enabled lock_manager in hardcoded init_net.
4) nfsd in init_net is started again,
its lockd_up() calls set_grace_period() and tries to add
lock_manager into init_net 2nd time.
Jeff Layton suggest:
"Make it safe to call locks_start_grace multiple times on the same
lock_manager. If it's already on the global grace_list, then don't try
to add it again. (But we don't intentionally add twice, so for now we
WARN about that case.)
With this change, we also need to ensure that the nfsd4 lock manager
initializes the list before we call locks_start_grace. While we're at
it, move the rest of the nfsd_net initialization into
nfs4_state_create_net. I see no reason to have it spread over two
functions like it is today."
Suggested patch was updated to generate warning in described situation.
Suggested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Since __state_in_grace return only true/false, make it return bool
instead of int.
Same change for the two user of it, locks_in_grace/opens_in_grace
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Commit c87fb4a378 ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens")
made the locks_in_grace() comment be in the wrong place.
This patch move this comment just at the right place.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This fix the following warning
fs/nfs_common/grace.c:66:1: warning: no previous prototype for function '__state_in_grace' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
by adding the missing static.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Make struct pernet_operations::id unsigned.
There are 2 reasons to do so:
1)
This field is really an index into an zero based array and
thus is unsigned entity. Using negative value is out-of-bound
access by definition.
2)
On x86_64 unsigned 32-bit data which are mixed with pointers
via array indexing or offsets added or subtracted to pointers
are preffered to signed 32-bit data.
"int" being used as an array index needs to be sign-extended
to 64-bit before being used.
void f(long *p, int i)
{
g(p[i]);
}
roughly translates to
movsx rsi, esi
mov rdi, [rsi+...]
call g
MOVSX is 3 byte instruction which isn't necessary if the variable is
unsigned because x86_64 is zero extending by default.
Now, there is net_generic() function which, you guessed it right, uses
"int" as an array index:
static inline void *net_generic(const struct net *net, int id)
{
...
ptr = ng->ptr[id - 1];
...
}
And this function is used a lot, so those sign extensions add up.
Patch snipes ~1730 bytes on allyesconfig kernel (without all junk
messing with code generation):
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 70/598 up/down: 396/-2126 (-1730)
Unfortunately some functions actually grow bigger.
This is a semmingly random artefact of code generation with register
allocator being used differently. gcc decides that some variable
needs to live in new r8+ registers and every access now requires REX
prefix. Or it is shifted into r12, so [r12+0] addressing mode has to be
used which is longer than [r8]
However, overall balance is in negative direction:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 70/598 up/down: 396/-2126 (-1730)
function old new delta
nfsd4_lock 3886 3959 +73
tipc_link_build_proto_msg 1096 1140 +44
mac80211_hwsim_new_radio 2776 2808 +32
tipc_mon_rcv 1032 1058 +26
svcauth_gss_legacy_init 1413 1429 +16
tipc_bcbase_select_primary 379 392 +13
nfsd4_exchange_id 1247 1260 +13
nfsd4_setclientid_confirm 782 793 +11
...
put_client_renew_locked 494 480 -14
ip_set_sockfn_get 730 716 -14
geneve_sock_add 829 813 -16
nfsd4_sequence_done 721 703 -18
nlmclnt_lookup_host 708 686 -22
nfsd4_lockt 1085 1063 -22
nfs_get_client 1077 1050 -27
tcf_bpf_init 1106 1076 -30
nfsd4_encode_fattr 5997 5930 -67
Total: Before=154856051, After=154854321, chg -0.00%
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
NLM locks don't conflict with NFSv4 share reservations, so we're not
going to learn anything new by watiting for them.
They do conflict with NFSv4 locks and with delegations.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Currently, all of the grace period handling is part of lockd. Eventually
though we'd like to be able to build v4-only servers, at which point
we'll need to put all of this elsewhere.
Move the code itself into fs/nfs_common and have it build a grace.ko
module. Then, rejigger the Kconfig options so that both nfsd and lockd
enable it automatically.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
David Howells
ChenXiaoSong
Cheng Lin
Thomas Gleixner
Vasily Averin
Corentin Labbe
Alexey Dobriyan
J. Bruce Fields
Jeff Layton